The periodic mass variations in yarn are mainly caused by \(\underline{\hspace{2cm}}\)
Step 1: Understand "periodic mass variations." Yarn evenness testing (using a spectrogram) can reveal different types of mass variations.
- Random variations: These are inherent to the process of forming a yarn from staple fibers and do not have a repeating pattern.
- Periodic variations: These are faults that repeat at regular intervals along the yarn length. They show up as distinct peaks on a spectrogram.
Step 2: Analyze the causes of periodic faults. A repeating, regular pattern is a tell-tale sign of a mechanical issue. Such faults are caused by a defective or improperly functioning rotating part in the spinning machinery, such as an eccentric (off-center) roller, a broken gear tooth, or a vibrating component. Each revolution of the faulty part creates a thick or thin spot in the yarn, leading to a fault whose wavelength corresponds to the circumference of that part.
Step 3: Evaluate the other options.
- (B) Machine setting: An incorrect setting might produce a generally poor yarn, but not typically a periodic fault unless it causes a part to vibrate.
- (C) Random fiber arrangement: This is the cause of random variations, not periodic ones.
- (D) Personal error: This is unlikely to cause a fault that repeats with machinelike regularity.
Conclusion: Periodic mass variations are almost always caused by mechanical machine faults.
Match the LIST-I (Spectroscopy) with LIST-II (Application)
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Visible light spectroscopy | III. Identification on the basis of color |
B. Fluorescence spectroscopy | IV. Identification on the basis of fluorophore present |
C. FTIR spectroscopy | I. Identification on the basis of absorption in infrared region |
D. Mass Spectroscopy | II. Identification on the basis of m/z ion |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Forensic Psychiatry | III. Behavioural pattern of criminal |
B. Forensic Engineering | IV. Origin of metallic fracture |
C. Forensic Odontology | I. Bite marks analysis |
D. Computer Forensics | II. Information derived from digital devices |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Calvin Goddard | II. Forensic Ballistics |
B. Karl Landsteiner | III. Blood Grouping |
C. Albert Osborn | IV. Document examination |
D. Mathieu Orfila | I. Forensic Toxicology |
Match the LIST-I (Evidence, etc.) with LIST-II (Example, Construction etc.)
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Biological evidence | IV. Blood |
B. Latent print evidence | III. Fingerprints |
C. Trace evidence | II. Soil |
D. Digital evidence | I. Cell phone records |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Ridges | III. The raised portion of the friction skin of the fingers |
B. Type Lines | I. Two most inner ridges which start parallel, diverge and surround or tend to surround the pattern area |
C. Delta | IV. The ridge characteristics nearest to the point of divergence of type lines |
D. Enclosure | II. A single ridge bifurcates and reunites to enclose some space |