Step 1: Determine the possible initial frequencies of the unknown fork.
Let the unknown frequency be \(f_1\). The reference frequency is \(f_2 = 256\) Hz. The beat frequency is \(f_{beat} = |f_1 - f_2| = 4\) Hz.
This gives two possibilities for \(f_1\):
- \(f_1 = 256 + 4 = 260\) Hz
- \(f_1 = 256 - 4 = 252\) Hz
Step 2: Analyze the effect of adding wax.
Adding wax to a tuning fork increases its mass, which causes its frequency to decrease. Let the new frequency of the first fork be \(f_1'\), where \(f_1'<f_1\).
Step 3: Test the two possibilities with the new information.
The new beat frequency is 3 Hz.
- Case A: Assume initial \(f_1 = 260\) Hz. When wax is added, its frequency \(f_1'\) will be slightly less than 260 Hz. The new beat frequency is \(|f_1' - 256|\). As \(f_1'\) moves from 260 towards 256, the difference decreases. It is possible for the beat frequency to become 3 Hz. This is consistent.
- Case B: Assume initial \(f_1 = 252\) Hz. When wax is added, its frequency \(f_1'\) will be slightly less than 252 Hz. The new beat frequency is \(|f_1' - 256| = 256 - f_1'\). As \(f_1'\) decreases from 252, it moves further away from 256, so the difference will increase. The beat frequency would become greater than 4 Hz, not 3 Hz. This contradicts the observation.
Step 4: Conclude the initial frequency.
Only the first case is consistent with the experimental result. Therefore, the original frequency of the first fork was 260 Hz.