Step 1: Define Short Fiber Content (SFC) and Neps.
- Short Fiber Content: The percentage of fibers in a sample that are shorter than a certain length (e.g., 12.5 mm). High SFC is generally undesirable.
- Neps: Small, tangled knots of fibers. They appear as defects in the yarn and fabric. Neps are often formed from short fibers or immature fibers that entangle during processing (especially carding).
Step 2: Analyze the relationship. Short fibers lack the length to be controlled properly by the drafting systems in spinning machinery. They are more likely to become disorganized, fly around, and get tangled up with other fibers, directly leading to the formation of neps. Therefore, a high short fiber content is a primary cause of a high nep count in yarn.
Step 3: Evaluate the other options. While high SFC can contribute to overall yarn unevenness (which includes thin and thick places), its most direct and significant impact is on the formation of neps. Controlling and reducing SFC is a key strategy for reducing neps.
Match the LIST-I (Spectroscopy) with LIST-II (Application)
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Visible light spectroscopy | III. Identification on the basis of color |
B. Fluorescence spectroscopy | IV. Identification on the basis of fluorophore present |
C. FTIR spectroscopy | I. Identification on the basis of absorption in infrared region |
D. Mass Spectroscopy | II. Identification on the basis of m/z ion |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Forensic Psychiatry | III. Behavioural pattern of criminal |
B. Forensic Engineering | IV. Origin of metallic fracture |
C. Forensic Odontology | I. Bite marks analysis |
D. Computer Forensics | II. Information derived from digital devices |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Calvin Goddard | II. Forensic Ballistics |
B. Karl Landsteiner | III. Blood Grouping |
C. Albert Osborn | IV. Document examination |
D. Mathieu Orfila | I. Forensic Toxicology |
Match the LIST-I (Evidence, etc.) with LIST-II (Example, Construction etc.)
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Biological evidence | IV. Blood |
B. Latent print evidence | III. Fingerprints |
C. Trace evidence | II. Soil |
D. Digital evidence | I. Cell phone records |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Ridges | III. The raised portion of the friction skin of the fingers |
B. Type Lines | I. Two most inner ridges which start parallel, diverge and surround or tend to surround the pattern area |
C. Delta | IV. The ridge characteristics nearest to the point of divergence of type lines |
D. Enclosure | II. A single ridge bifurcates and reunites to enclose some space |