Question:

The passage given below is followed by four summaries. Choose the option that best captures the author’s position:
A Japanese government panel announced that it recommends regulating only genetically modified organisms that have had foreign genes permanently introduced into their genomes and not those whose endogenous genes have been edited. The only stipulation is that researchers and businesses will have to register their modifications to plants or animals with the government, with the exception of microbes cultured in contained environments. Reactions to the decision are mixed. While lauding the potential benefits of genome editing, an editorial opposes across-the-board permission. Unforeseen risks in gene editing cannot be ruled out. All genetically modified products must go through the same safety and labeling processes regardless of method.

Updated On: Jul 29, 2025
  • A government panel in Japan says transgenic modification and genome editing are not the same.
  • Excepting microbes cultured in contained environments from the regulations of genome editing is premature.
  • Exempting from regulations the editing of endogenous genes is not desirable as this procedure might be risk-prone.
  • Creating categories within genetically modified products in terms of transgenic modification and genome editing advances science but defies laws.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is C

Solution and Explanation

The task is to summarize the author's position regarding the Japanese government's approach to regulating genetically modified organisms (GMOs). A Japanese government panel suggests only regulating GMOs with foreign genes permanently introduced and not those with edited endogenous genes, except for cultured microbes. The author implies that exempting edited endogenous genes could be risky, despite potential benefits, since unforeseen risks can't be ruled out. Thus, all genetically modified items should undergo consistent safety and labeling checks. 

Key PointDetail
Government Panel RecommendationRegulate only GMOs with foreign genes.
Registration RequirementMandatory for modifications, except contained microbes.
Editorial StancePraises benefits but warns against blanket permission due to risks.
ConclusionConsistent safety checks for all modified products are essential.

This author's stance aligns with option three: “Exempting from regulations the editing of endogenous genes is not desirable as this procedure might be risk-prone.” This summary reflects caution against unregulated endogenous gene editing, acknowledging potential risks and supporting uniform safety protocols.

Was this answer helpful?
0
0

Top Questions on Para Summary

View More Questions