The task is to summarize the author's position regarding the Japanese government's approach to regulating genetically modified organisms (GMOs). A Japanese government panel suggests only regulating GMOs with foreign genes permanently introduced and not those with edited endogenous genes, except for cultured microbes. The author implies that exempting edited endogenous genes could be risky, despite potential benefits, since unforeseen risks can't be ruled out. Thus, all genetically modified items should undergo consistent safety and labeling checks.
Key Point | Detail |
---|---|
Government Panel Recommendation | Regulate only GMOs with foreign genes. |
Registration Requirement | Mandatory for modifications, except contained microbes. |
Editorial Stance | Praises benefits but warns against blanket permission due to risks. |
Conclusion | Consistent safety checks for all modified products are essential. |
This author's stance aligns with option three: “Exempting from regulations the editing of endogenous genes is not desirable as this procedure might be risk-prone.” This summary reflects caution against unregulated endogenous gene editing, acknowledging potential risks and supporting uniform safety protocols.
When $10^{100}$ is divided by 7, the remainder is ?