Let's summarize your points:
Option 2: This option precisely captures the essence of the passage by highlighting that engineering incorporates the constraints and conditions of physics in the real world. It aligns with the main theme of the passage.
Option 1: This option is rejected because it suggests a strictly linear relationship, which doesn't reflect the nuanced discussion in the passage about engineers finding utility even in theories considered false in pure physics.
Option 3: This option is ruled out as it solely focuses on engineers and doesn't address the relationship between pure science and engineering, which is a key aspect discussed in the passage.
Option 4: This option is eliminated because it provides a summary that deviates from the main theme of the passage.
Your careful consideration of the options in relation to the passage content demonstrates a strong understanding of the text. Option 2 accurately reflects the passage's key points about the relationship between pure science and engineering.
Read the sentence and infer the writer's tone: "The politician's speech was filled with lofty promises and little substance, a performance repeated every election season."