Step 1: Identifying oxidation states and electronic configurations
- [Fe(CN)6]4−
• Fe is in the +2 oxidation state (3d6).
• CN− is a strong field ligand, causing pairing of electrons.
• The complex is low spin but still contains unpaired electrons in the t2g orbitals.
- [Fe(CN)6]3−
• Fe is in the +3 oxidation state (3d5).
• CN− is a strong field ligand.
• The complex is low spin and has one unpaired electron in the t2g orbitals.
- [Zn(NH3)6]2+
• Zn is in the +2 oxidation state (3d10).
• All orbitals are completely filled, so it is diamagnetic.
• However, it is not a candidate where paramagnetic behavior is being evaluated.
- [Ni(NH3)6]2+
• Ni is in the +2 oxidation state (3d8).
• NH3 is a weak field ligand, leading to a high spin configuration.
• The t2g orbitals are completely filled with paired electrons, making it the correct choice.
Step 2: Conclusion
Since the question asks for the paramagnetic complex with no unpaired electrons in t2g orbitals, the correct answer is [Ni(NH3)6]2+.
Werner’s coordination theory in 1893 was the first attempt to explain the bonding in coordination complexes. It must be remembered that this theory was put forward before the electron had been discovered by J.J. Thomson in 1897, and before the electronic theory of valency. Werner did not have any of the modern instrumental techniques and all his studies were made using simple experimental techniques. Werner was able to explain the nature of bonding in complexes and he concluded that in complexes, the metal shows two different sorts of valency: primary and secondary. Primary valences are normally ionisable whereas secondary valences are non-ionisable.