From the given equation: \[ 2x + 5y = 99 \Rightarrow x = \frac{99 - 5y}{2} \] For \(x\) to be an integer, \(99 - 5y\) must be even. Since 99 is odd and 5y is odd when y is odd, we conclude: \[ y \text{ must be odd} \]
Try \(y = -19\), then: \[ x = \frac{99 - 5(-19)}{2} = \frac{99 + 95}{2} = \frac{194}{2} = 97 \] Try \(y = 13\), then: \[ x = \frac{99 - 65}{2} = \frac{34}{2} = 17 \] So, valid \(y\) values range from \(-19\) to \(13\) in steps of 2 (odd numbers).
This is an arithmetic progression with: \[ a = -19,\quad d = 2,\quad t_n = 13 \] Use the formula for nth term: \[ t_n = a + (n - 1)d \] \[ 13 = -19 + (n - 1) \cdot 2 \Rightarrow 32 = 2(n - 1) \Rightarrow n = 17 \] So, there are 17 valid values of \(y\), and each gives an integer \(x\), satisfying \(x \geq y\).
Rearranging the equation: \[ x = \frac{99 - 5y}{2} \] For \(x\) to be an integer, the numerator must be even. Since 99 is odd, \(5y\) must also be odd ⇒ \(y\) must be odd.
Let’s try some values of odd \(y\):
We observe that each increment of \(y\) by 2 decreases \(x\) by 5.
Let’s find all odd values of \(y\) such that \(x = \frac{99 - 5y}{2}\) is an integer and \(x \geq y\).
We are told: \[ x \geq y \Rightarrow \frac{99 - 5y}{2} \geq y \Rightarrow 99 - 5y \geq 2y \Rightarrow 99 \geq 7y \Rightarrow y \leq 14.14 \] So the largest valid odd integer \(y\) is 13.
Also: \[ \text{Smallest odd integer that gives integer } x = -19 \Rightarrow \text{Start from } y = -19 \text{ up to } y = 13 \]
This is an arithmetic sequence: \[ a = -19, \quad d = 2, \quad l = 13 \] Number of terms: \[ n = \frac{(13 - (-19))}{2} + 1 = \frac{32}{2} + 1 = 16 + 1 = 17 \]
For any natural number $k$, let $a_k = 3^k$. The smallest natural number $m$ for which \[ (a_1)^1 \times (a_2)^2 \times \dots \times (a_{20})^{20} \;<\; a_{21} \times a_{22} \times \dots \times a_{20+m} \] is:
The given sentence is missing in the paragraph below. Decide where it best fits among the options 1, 2, 3, or 4 indicated in the paragraph.
Sentence: While taste is related to judgment, with thinkers at the time often writing, for example, about “judgments of taste” or using the two terms interchangeably, taste retains a vital link to pleasure, embodiment, and personal specificity that is too often elided in post-Kantian ideas about judgment—a link that Arendt herself was working to restore.
Paragraph: \(\underline{(1)}\) Denneny focused on taste rather than judgment in order to highlight what he believed was a crucial but neglected historical change. \(\underline{(2)}\) Over the course of the seventeenth century and early eighteenth century, across Western Europe, the word taste took on a new extension of meaning, no longer referring specifically to gustatory sensation and the delights of the palate but becoming, for a time, one of the central categories for aesthetic—and ethical—thinking. \(\underline{(3)}\) Tracing the history of taste in Spanish, French, and British aesthetic theory, as Denneny did, also provides a means to recover the compelling and relevant writing of a set of thinkers who have been largely neglected by professional philosophy. \(\underline{(4)}\)