The legal maxim 'ubi jus ibi remedium' is a fundamental principle in legal studies.
The Latin phrase translates to "Where there is a right, there is a remedy". This principle implies that if a legal right is violated, the law provides a remedy to address that wrong.
| Principle | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Ubi Jus Ibi Remedium | Where there is a wrong, there is a remedy. |
This means that for every infringement of a legal right, the law provides a form of relief or compensation to the aggrieved party.
It underscores the belief that rights are meaningless without enforcement mechanisms to rectify wrongs.
The correct interpretation of 'ubi jus ibi remedium' is: "Where there is a wrong, there is a remedy."
| I. Arbitration of excepted matters | 1. A. Ayyasamy v. A. Paramasivam, (2016) 10 SCC 386 |
| II. Conditional Arbitration Clauses | 2. In re - Interplay between Arb Agreements and Stamp Act 2023 INSC 1066 |
| III. Separability of Arbitration Agreement - Kompetenz Kompetenz | 3. Vulcan Insurance Co Ltd v. Maharaj Singh and Anr (1976) 1 SCC 943 |
| IV. Arbitrability of fraud | 4. Mitra Guha Builders (India) Co v. ONGC (2020) 3 SCC 222 |
| Offenses | Sections |
| (A) Voyeurism | (1) Section 77 |
| (B) Word, gesture or act intended to insult the modesty of a woman | (2) Section 79 |
| (C) Stalking | (3) Section 75 |
| (D) Sexual Harassment | (4) Section 78 |