The kinetic energy of photoelectrons increases by 0.52 eV when the wavelength of incident light is changed from 500 nm to another web length which is approximately
Energy of a photon is given by the equation:
\( E = \frac{hc}{\lambda} \)
Where:
Convert the energy difference from eV to Joules:
\( 0.52 \, \text{eV} = 0.52 \times 1.6 \times 10^{-19} \, \text{J} = 8.32 \times 10^{-20} \, \text{J} \)
For the initial wavelength of 500 nm:
\( \lambda_{\text{initial}} = 500 \times 10^{-9} \, \text{m} \)
The initial energy (\( E_{\text{initial}} \)) is calculated as:
\(E_{\text{initial}} = \frac{(6.626 \times 10^{-34} \, \text{Js}) \times (3 \times 10^8 \, \text{m/s})}{500 \times 10^{-9} \, \text{m}} = 3.9768 \times 10^{-19} \, \text{J}\)
For the new wavelength \( \lambda_{\text{new}} \), the energy difference is given by:
\( E_{\text{new}} - E_{\text{initial}} = 8.32 \times 10^{-20} \, \text{J} \)
Now, solving for \( E_{\text{new}} \):
\( E_{\text{new}} = 3.9768 \times 10^{-19} + 8.32 \times 10^{-20} = 4.8 \times 10^{-19} \, \text{J} \)
Now, substitute the new energy into the equation:
\( \frac{(6.626 \times 10^{-34} \, \text{Js}) \times (3 \times 10^8 \, \text{m/s})}{\lambda_{\text{new}}} = 4.8 \times 10^{-19} \, \text{J} \)
Solving for \( \lambda_{\text{new}} \):
\( \lambda_{\text{new}} = \frac{(6.626 \times 10^{-34}) \times (3 \times 10^8)}{4.8 \times 10^{-19}} \) \end{equation*} \[ \lambda_{\text{new}} \approx 4.140625 \times 10^{-7} \, \text{m} \]
Convert \( \lambda_{\text{new}} \) to nanometers:
\( \lambda_{\text{new}} \approx 414 \, \text{nm} \)
Therefore, the approximate new wavelength is: 414 nm
After comparing with the answer choices: The correct option is \( \boxed{400 \, \text{nm}} \), which is close to our calculated result.
Given the change in kinetic energy, \( \Delta K = 0.52 \, \text{eV} \) and the wavelength \( \lambda_1 = 500 \, \text{nm} \), we need to find \( \lambda_2 \). The relationship can be derived from the photoelectric effect equations:
\( K_1 = \frac{\lambda_1 hc}{\lambda_1} = \phi \)
\( K_2 = \frac{\lambda_2 hc}{\lambda_2} - \phi \)
Now, let’s express the change in kinetic energy:
\[ K_1 - K_2 = hc \left( \frac{1}{\lambda_1} - \frac{1}{\lambda_2} \right) \]
Substitute the given values for \( \Delta K = -0.52 \, \text{eV} \):
\[ - \Delta K = hc \left( \frac{1}{\lambda_1} - \frac{1}{\lambda_2} \right) \] \]
Substituting the known constants: \( h = 6.626 \times 10^{-34} \, \text{Js} \), \( c = 3.0 \times 10^8 \, \text{m/s} \), and using \( \lambda_1 = 500 \, \text{nm} \), and the value of energy:
\[ - 0.52 \, \text{eV} = (1242 \, \text{eVnm}) \left( \frac{1}{500 \, \text{nm}} - \frac{1}{\lambda_2} \right) \]
Next, solve for \( \lambda_2 \):
\[ \frac{1242}{-0.52} = 500 \left( \frac{1}{\lambda_2} \right) + \frac{1242}{0.52} \]
Simplifying the equation:
\[ \frac{1}{\lambda_2} = \frac{500}{1242} + \frac{0.52}{1242} \]
Thus, solving for \( \lambda_2 \), we get:
\[ \lambda_2 = 413 \, \text{nm} \]
Therefore, the wavelength \( \lambda_2 = 400 \, \text{nm} \).
Given below are two statements: one is labelled as Assertion (A) and the other one is labelled as Reason (R).
Assertion (A): Emission of electrons in the photoelectric effect can be suppressed by applying a sufficiently negative electron potential to the photoemissive substance.
Reason (R): A negative electric potential, which stops the emission of electrons from the surface of a photoemissive substance, varies linearly with the frequency of incident radiation.
In light of the above statements, choose the most appropriate answer from the options given below:
When light shines on a metal, electrons can be ejected from the surface of the metal in a phenomenon known as the photoelectric effect. This process is also often referred to as photoemission, and the electrons that are ejected from the metal are called photoelectrons.
According to Einstein’s explanation of the photoelectric effect :
The energy of photon = energy needed to remove an electron + kinetic energy of the emitted electron
i.e. hν = W + E
Where,