Step 1: Understand the Kawabata Evaluation System (KES-FB). This is a set of standardized instruments designed to objectively measure the low-stress mechanical properties of fabrics that relate to the subjective feeling of "hand" (e.g., softness, stiffness, smoothness). The system consists of four main instruments.
Step 2: Identify the properties measured by each instrument.
- KES-FB1 (Tensile and Shear Tester): Measures properties related to stretching and shearing the fabric. This includes tensile strain, linearity of the load-elongation curve (A), and tensile energy (C).
- KES-FB2 (Pure Bending Tester): Measures how a fabric resists bending. This gives bending rigidity or stiffness (D).
- KES-FB3 (Compression Tester): Measures the properties of the fabric when it is compressed. This includes thickness, compressibility, and compression resilience (B).
- KES-FB4 (Surface Tester): Measures surface friction and roughness.
Step 3: Evaluate the listed properties. All four properties listed (A, B, C, and D) are standard parameters measured by the different modules of the KES-FB system. Therefore, all are correct.
Match Fibre with Application.\[\begin{array}{|l|l|} \hline \textbf{LIST I} & \textbf{LIST II} \\ \textbf{Fibre} & \textbf{Application} \\ \hline \hline \text{A. Silk fibre} & \text{I. Fire retardant} \\ \hline \text{B. Wool fibre} & \text{II. Directional lustre} \\ \hline \text{C. Nomex fibre} & \text{III. Bulletproof} \\ \hline \text{D. Kevlar fibre} & \text{IV. Thermal insulation} \\ \hline \end{array}\]
The strength of fiber is usually measured in bundle form because there is better correlation between fiber bundle strength and \(\underline{\hspace{2cm}}\)
Match the LIST-I (Spectroscopy) with LIST-II (Application)
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Visible light spectroscopy | III. Identification on the basis of color |
B. Fluorescence spectroscopy | IV. Identification on the basis of fluorophore present |
C. FTIR spectroscopy | I. Identification on the basis of absorption in infrared region |
D. Mass Spectroscopy | II. Identification on the basis of m/z ion |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Forensic Psychiatry | III. Behavioural pattern of criminal |
B. Forensic Engineering | IV. Origin of metallic fracture |
C. Forensic Odontology | I. Bite marks analysis |
D. Computer Forensics | II. Information derived from digital devices |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Calvin Goddard | II. Forensic Ballistics |
B. Karl Landsteiner | III. Blood Grouping |
C. Albert Osborn | IV. Document examination |
D. Mathieu Orfila | I. Forensic Toxicology |
Match the LIST-I (Evidence, etc.) with LIST-II (Example, Construction etc.)
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Biological evidence | IV. Blood |
B. Latent print evidence | III. Fingerprints |
C. Trace evidence | II. Soil |
D. Digital evidence | I. Cell phone records |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Ridges | III. The raised portion of the friction skin of the fingers |
B. Type Lines | I. Two most inner ridges which start parallel, diverge and surround or tend to surround the pattern area |
C. Delta | IV. The ridge characteristics nearest to the point of divergence of type lines |
D. Enclosure | II. A single ridge bifurcates and reunites to enclose some space |