Comprehension
The idea of the brain as an information processor—a machine manipulating blips of energy according to fathomable rules—has come to dominate neuroscience. However, one enemy of the brain-as-computer metaphor is John R. Searle, a philosopher who argues that since computers simply follow algorithms, they cannot deal with important aspects of human thought such as meaning and content. Computers are syntactic, rather than semantic, creatures. People, on the other hand, understand meaning because they have something Searle obscurely calls the causal powers of the brain.
Yet how would a brain work if not by reducing what it learns about the world to information—some kind of code that can be transmitted from neuron to neuron? What else could meaning and content be? If the code can be cracked, a computer should be able to simulate it, at least in principle. But even if a computer could simulate the workings of the mind, Searle would claim that the machine would not really be thinking; it would just be acting as if it were. His argument proceeds thus: if a computer were used to simulate a stomach, with the stomach’s churnings faithfully reproduced on a video screen, the machine would not be digesting real food. It would just be blindly manipulating the symbols that generate the visual display.
Suppose, though, that a stomach were simulated using plastic tubes, a motor to do the churning, a supply of digestive juices, and a timing mechanism. If food went in one end of the device, what came out the other end would surely be digested food. Brains, unlike stomachs, are information processors, and if one information processor were made to simulate another information processor, it is hard to see how one and not the other could be said to think. Simulated thoughts and real thoughts are made of the same element: information. The representations of the world that humans carry around in their heads are already simulations. To accept Searle’s argument, one would have to deny the most fundamental notion in psychology and neuroscience: that brains work by processing information
Yet how would a brain work if not by reducing what it learns about the world to information—some kind of code that can be transmitted from neuron to neuron? What else could meaning and content be? If the code can be cracked, a computer should be able to simulate it, at least in principle. But even if a computer could simulate the workings of the mind, Searle would claim that the machine would not really be thinking; it would just be acting as if it were. His argument proceeds thus: if a computer were used to simulate a stomach, with the stomach’s churnings faithfully reproduced on a video screen, the machine would not be digesting real food. It would just be blindly manipulating the symbols that generate the visual display.
Suppose, though, that a stomach were simulated using plastic tubes, a motor to do the churning, a supply of digestive juices, and a timing mechanism. If food went in one end of the device, what came out the other end would surely be digested food. Brains, unlike stomachs, are information processors, and if one information processor were made to simulate another information processor, it is hard to see how one and not the other could be said to think. Simulated thoughts and real thoughts are made of the same element: information. The representations of the world that humans carry around in their heads are already simulations. To accept Searle’s argument, one would have to deny the most fundamental notion in psychology and neuroscience: that brains work by processing information
Question: 1
The main purpose of the passage is to:
The main purpose of the passage is to:
Show Hint
When reading philosophical arguments, focus on whether the passage is attempting to refute, support, or analyze a particular viewpoint.
Updated On: Oct 1, 2025
- propose an experiment
- analyze a function
- refute an argument
- explain a contradiction
- simulate a process
Hide Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is C
Solution and Explanation
Step 1: Understanding the passage's purpose.
The passage primarily challenges John R. Searle's argument that computers cannot replicate the complexities of human thought because they follow algorithms and lack "causal powers." The author refutes this argument by explaining how computers, as information processors, could simulate brain functions.
Step 2: Analyzing the options.
- (A) The passage does not propose an experiment but discusses an existing philosophical argument.
- (B) The passage does not focus on analyzing a function, but rather on refuting Searle’s claim.
- (C) The passage directly refutes Searle’s argument about the limitations of computers in replicating human thought. This is the correct answer.
- (D) While the passage addresses a contradiction in Searle’s argument, it does not primarily aim to explain a contradiction.
- (E) The passage does not discuss simulating a process but focuses on refuting a claim about simulation.
Step 3: Conclusion.
The correct answer is (C), as the passage refutes an argument rather than proposing, analyzing, or simulating anything.
The passage primarily challenges John R. Searle's argument that computers cannot replicate the complexities of human thought because they follow algorithms and lack "causal powers." The author refutes this argument by explaining how computers, as information processors, could simulate brain functions.
Step 2: Analyzing the options.
- (A) The passage does not propose an experiment but discusses an existing philosophical argument.
- (B) The passage does not focus on analyzing a function, but rather on refuting Searle’s claim.
- (C) The passage directly refutes Searle’s argument about the limitations of computers in replicating human thought. This is the correct answer.
- (D) While the passage addresses a contradiction in Searle’s argument, it does not primarily aim to explain a contradiction.
- (E) The passage does not discuss simulating a process but focuses on refuting a claim about simulation.
Step 3: Conclusion.
The correct answer is (C), as the passage refutes an argument rather than proposing, analyzing, or simulating anything.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 2
Which of the following is most consistent with Searle's reasoning as presented in the passage?
Which of the following is most consistent with Searle's reasoning as presented in the passage?
Show Hint
When analyzing philosophical arguments, look for statements that reflect key distinctions the author makes, such as the difference between algorithmic processing and meaningful understanding.
Updated On: Oct 1, 2025
- Meaning and content cannot be reduced to algorithms.
- The process of digestion can be simulated mechanically, but not on a computer.
- Simulated thoughts and real thoughts are essentially similar because they are composed primarily of information.
- A computer can use "causal powers" similar to those of the human brain when processing information.
- Computer simulations of the world can achieve the complexity of the brain’s representations of the world.
Hide Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is A
Solution and Explanation
Step 1: Understanding Searle's reasoning.
Searle argues that while computers can follow algorithms to process information, they lack the ability to understand meaning or content, which are beyond mere algorithmic processes. He believes that meaning and content cannot be reduced to the mechanical processing of symbols.
Step 2: Analyzing the options.
- (A) This is the correct answer. Searle argues that meaning and content cannot be reduced to algorithmic processes.
- (B) This is unrelated to Searle’s argument about algorithms and meaning.
- (C) This contradicts Searle’s claim that simulated thoughts and real thoughts are fundamentally different because simulated thoughts lack meaning.
- (D) This contradicts Searle’s position, as he argues that computers lack the "causal powers" of the brain.
- (E) Searle would reject this idea, arguing that simulations cannot replicate the complexity of human thought.
Step 3: Conclusion.
The correct answer is (A), as it directly aligns with Searle’s belief that meaning cannot be reduced to algorithms.
Searle argues that while computers can follow algorithms to process information, they lack the ability to understand meaning or content, which are beyond mere algorithmic processes. He believes that meaning and content cannot be reduced to the mechanical processing of symbols.
Step 2: Analyzing the options.
- (A) This is the correct answer. Searle argues that meaning and content cannot be reduced to algorithmic processes.
- (B) This is unrelated to Searle’s argument about algorithms and meaning.
- (C) This contradicts Searle’s claim that simulated thoughts and real thoughts are fundamentally different because simulated thoughts lack meaning.
- (D) This contradicts Searle’s position, as he argues that computers lack the "causal powers" of the brain.
- (E) Searle would reject this idea, arguing that simulations cannot replicate the complexity of human thought.
Step 3: Conclusion.
The correct answer is (A), as it directly aligns with Searle’s belief that meaning cannot be reduced to algorithms.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 3
The author of the passage would be most likely to agree with which of the following statements about the simulation of organ functions?
The author of the passage would be most likely to agree with which of the following statements about the simulation of organ functions?
Show Hint
In philosophical discussions of simulations, note the distinction between replicating physical functions and replicating cognitive processes.
Updated On: Oct 1, 2025
- An artificial device that achieves the functions of the stomach could be considered a valid model of the stomach.
- Computer simulations of the brain are best used to crack the brain’s codes of meaning and content.
- Computer simulations of the brain challenge ideas that are fundamental to psychology and neuroscience.
- Because the brain and the stomach both act as processors, they can be simulated by mechanical devices.
- The computer’s limitations in simulating digestion suggest equal limitations in computer-simulated thinking.
Hide Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is A
Solution and Explanation
Step 1: Understanding the author's view on simulation.
The author discusses the simulation of the stomach using mechanical devices as a way to argue that simulations can replicate real functions. The author would likely support the idea that a mechanical device can be considered a valid model of the stomach, similar to how the brain’s functions might be simulated.
Step 2: Analyzing the options.
- (A) This is the correct answer. The author suggests that simulating the stomach’s function mechanically with a device would be valid, just as simulating brain functions could be.
- (B) The passage does not suggest using brain simulations to crack meaning and content; instead, it critiques the idea that computers cannot replicate the brain's functions.
- (C) The passage does not focus on challenging fundamental ideas in psychology but on the validity of brain simulations.
- (D) This oversimplifies the comparison between the brain and the stomach, as the passage focuses more on their roles as information processors rather than mechanical devices.
- (E) This misinterprets the author’s view, as the passage does not suggest limitations in computer-simulated thinking based on digestive processes.
Step 3: Conclusion.
The correct answer is (A), as it best aligns with the passage’s argument about the validity of simulating biological functions.
The author discusses the simulation of the stomach using mechanical devices as a way to argue that simulations can replicate real functions. The author would likely support the idea that a mechanical device can be considered a valid model of the stomach, similar to how the brain’s functions might be simulated.
Step 2: Analyzing the options.
- (A) This is the correct answer. The author suggests that simulating the stomach’s function mechanically with a device would be valid, just as simulating brain functions could be.
- (B) The passage does not suggest using brain simulations to crack meaning and content; instead, it critiques the idea that computers cannot replicate the brain's functions.
- (C) The passage does not focus on challenging fundamental ideas in psychology but on the validity of brain simulations.
- (D) This oversimplifies the comparison between the brain and the stomach, as the passage focuses more on their roles as information processors rather than mechanical devices.
- (E) This misinterprets the author’s view, as the passage does not suggest limitations in computer-simulated thinking based on digestive processes.
Step 3: Conclusion.
The correct answer is (A), as it best aligns with the passage’s argument about the validity of simulating biological functions.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 4
It can be inferred that the author of the passage believes that Searle's argument is flawed by its failure to:
It can be inferred that the author of the passage believes that Searle's argument is flawed by its failure to:
Show Hint
When analyzing arguments, look for flaws related to fundamental distinctions, such as syntax (structure) vs. semantics (meaning).
Updated On: Oct 1, 2025
- distinguish between syntactic and semantic operations
- explain adequately how people, unlike computers, are able to understand meaning
- provide concrete examples illustrating its claims about thinking
- understand how computers use algorithms to process information
- decipher the code that is transmitted from neuron to neuron in the brain
Hide Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is A
Solution and Explanation
Step 1: Understanding the context.
The author critiques Searle's argument that computers lack the ability to understand meaning, focusing on Searle's failure to distinguish between syntactic (structure) and semantic (meaning) operations in processing information.
Step 2: Analyzing the options.
- (A) This is the correct answer. The author believes that Searle’s argument is flawed because he fails to distinguish between syntax (the rules computers follow) and semantics (the meaning behind information).
- (B) While the passage discusses meaning, it does not claim that Searle fails to explain how computers differ in understanding meaning.
- (C) The passage does not focus on providing concrete examples for claims about thinking but critiques a philosophical argument.
- (D) The passage does not center on how computers process information, but on the limitations of Searle’s view.
- (E) The author does not focus on how Searle addresses the transmission of code in the brain.
Step 3: Conclusion.
The correct answer is (A), as it directly aligns with the criticism that Searle fails to distinguish between syntax and semantics.
The author critiques Searle's argument that computers lack the ability to understand meaning, focusing on Searle's failure to distinguish between syntactic (structure) and semantic (meaning) operations in processing information.
Step 2: Analyzing the options.
- (A) This is the correct answer. The author believes that Searle’s argument is flawed because he fails to distinguish between syntax (the rules computers follow) and semantics (the meaning behind information).
- (B) While the passage discusses meaning, it does not claim that Searle fails to explain how computers differ in understanding meaning.
- (C) The passage does not focus on providing concrete examples for claims about thinking but critiques a philosophical argument.
- (D) The passage does not center on how computers process information, but on the limitations of Searle’s view.
- (E) The author does not focus on how Searle addresses the transmission of code in the brain.
Step 3: Conclusion.
The correct answer is (A), as it directly aligns with the criticism that Searle fails to distinguish between syntax and semantics.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 5
From the passage, it can be inferred that the author would agree with Searle on which of the following points?
From the passage, it can be inferred that the author would agree with Searle on which of the following points?
Show Hint
When evaluating comparisons, consider whether the complexities of the topic are adequately captured by the analogy.
Updated On: Oct 1, 2025
- Computers operate by following algorithms.
- The human brain can never fully understand its own functions.
- The comparison of the brain to a machine is overly simplistic.
- The most accurate models of physical processes are computer simulations.
- Human thought and computer-simulated thought involve similar processes of representation.
Hide Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is C
Solution and Explanation
Step 1: Understanding the context.
The author argues that Searle’s comparison of the brain to a computer is too simplistic, as the brain’s complexities cannot be fully captured by machine analogies.
Step 2: Analyzing the options.
- (A) The author does not agree with Searle's view that computers can operate by following algorithms in the way human brains process meaning.
- (B) The author does not focus on the idea that the brain cannot understand itself but on how brains differ from computers.
- (C) This is the correct answer. The author critiques the simplification of comparing the brain directly to a machine.
- (D) The author does not assert that computer simulations are the most accurate models of physical processes.
- (E) The author does not claim that human thought and computer-simulated thought are similar in their processes.
Step 3: Conclusion.
The correct answer is (C), as it reflects the author’s critique of the simplistic comparison between the brain and a machine.
The author argues that Searle’s comparison of the brain to a computer is too simplistic, as the brain’s complexities cannot be fully captured by machine analogies.
Step 2: Analyzing the options.
- (A) The author does not agree with Searle's view that computers can operate by following algorithms in the way human brains process meaning.
- (B) The author does not focus on the idea that the brain cannot understand itself but on how brains differ from computers.
- (C) This is the correct answer. The author critiques the simplification of comparing the brain directly to a machine.
- (D) The author does not assert that computer simulations are the most accurate models of physical processes.
- (E) The author does not claim that human thought and computer-simulated thought are similar in their processes.
Step 3: Conclusion.
The correct answer is (C), as it reflects the author’s critique of the simplistic comparison between the brain and a machine.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 6
Which of the following most accurately represents Searle’s criticism of the brain-as-computer metaphor, as that criticism is described in the passage?
Which of the following most accurately represents Searle’s criticism of the brain-as-computer metaphor, as that criticism is described in the passage?
Show Hint
When analyzing metaphors, consider whether they capture the complexity and unique features of the entities they compare.
Updated On: Oct 1, 2025
- The metaphor is not experimentally verifiable.
- The metaphor suggests that a brain's functions can be simulated as easily as those of a stomach.
- The metaphor suggests that a computer can simulate the workings of the mind by using the codes of neural transmission.
- The metaphor does not take into account the unique powers of the brain.
- The metaphor is unhelpful because both the brain and the computer process information.
Hide Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is D
Solution and Explanation
Step 1: Understanding Searle’s criticism.
Searle criticizes the brain-as-computer metaphor for oversimplifying the complexities of the brain, particularly by failing to account for the brain's unique powers, such as understanding meaning.
Step 2: Analyzing the options.
- (A) This is not the main focus of Searle’s criticism; he argues that the brain’s complexity is not captured by the computer metaphor.
- (B) This does not accurately represent Searle’s argument, as he critiques the comparison with a stomach, not its simulation.
- (C) Searle does not claim that the brain works the same way as a computer; he criticizes the idea that computers can simulate the brain's functions.
- (D) This is the correct answer. Searle argues that the brain’s unique powers, which involve understanding meaning, are overlooked by the brain-as-computer metaphor.
- (E) The comparison of the brain and the computer is flawed, but not for the reason stated in this option.
Step 3: Conclusion.
The correct answer is (D), as it best captures Searle’s criticism that the brain’s unique powers are not considered in the brain-as-computer metaphor.
Searle criticizes the brain-as-computer metaphor for oversimplifying the complexities of the brain, particularly by failing to account for the brain's unique powers, such as understanding meaning.
Step 2: Analyzing the options.
- (A) This is not the main focus of Searle’s criticism; he argues that the brain’s complexity is not captured by the computer metaphor.
- (B) This does not accurately represent Searle’s argument, as he critiques the comparison with a stomach, not its simulation.
- (C) Searle does not claim that the brain works the same way as a computer; he criticizes the idea that computers can simulate the brain's functions.
- (D) This is the correct answer. Searle argues that the brain’s unique powers, which involve understanding meaning, are overlooked by the brain-as-computer metaphor.
- (E) The comparison of the brain and the computer is flawed, but not for the reason stated in this option.
Step 3: Conclusion.
The correct answer is (D), as it best captures Searle’s criticism that the brain’s unique powers are not considered in the brain-as-computer metaphor.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Top Questions on Reading Comprehension
For the past two years at FasCorp, there has been a policy to advertise any job opening to current employees and to give no job to an applicant from outside the company if a FasCorp employee applies who is qualified for the job. This policy has been strictly followed, yet even though numerous employees of FasCorp have been qualified for any given entry-level position, some entry-level jobs have been filled with people from outside the company.
If the information provided is true, which of the following must on the basis of it also be true about FasCorp during the past two years?- GRE - 2025
- Verbal Reasoning
- Reading Comprehension
As an example of the devastation wrought on music publishers by the photocopier, one executive noted that for a recent choral festival with 1,200 singers, the festival’s organizing committee purchased only 12 copies of the music published by her company that was 5 performed as part of the festival.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the support the example lends to the executive’s contention that music publishers have been devastated by the photocopier?- GRE - 2025
- Verbal Reasoning
- Reading Comprehension
- In the 1970s, two debates engaged many scholars of early United States history. One focused on the status of women, primarily White women. Turning on the so-called golden age theory, which posited that during the eighteenth-century colonial era, American women enjoyed a brief period of high status relative to their English contemporaries and to nineteenth-century American women, this debate pitted scholars who believed women’s lives deteriorated after 1800 against those who thought women’s lives had been no better before 1800. At issue were the causes of women’s subordination: were these causes already in place when the English first settled North America or did they emerge with the rise of nineteenth-century industrial capitalism?
The second debate, the so-called origins debate, concerned the emergence of racial slavery in the southern colonies: was slavery the inevitable result of the deep-rooted racial prejudice of early British colonists or did racial prejudice arise only after these planters instituted slave labor?
Although these debates are parallel in some respects, key differences distinguished them. Whereas the debate over women’s status revolved around implicit comparisons of colonial women to their counterparts in the antebellum period (1800--1860), thus inviting comment from scholars of both historical periods, the origins debate was primarily confined to a discussion about slavery in colonial America. Second, in contrast to the newness of the debate over women’s status and its continued currency throughout the early 1980s, the debate over race and slavery, begun in the 1950s, had lost some of its urgency with the publication of Morgan’s American Slavery, American Freedom (1975), widely regarded as the last word on the subject.
Each debate also assumed a different relationship to the groups whose histories it concerned. In its heyday, the origins debate focused mainly on White attitudes toward Africans rather than on Africans themselves. With few exceptions, such as Wood’s Black Majority (1974) and Mullin’s Flight and Rebellion (1972), which were centrally concerned with enslaved African men, most works pertaining to the origins debate focused on the White architects, mostly male, of racial slavery. In contrast, although women’s historians were interested in the institutions and ideologies contributing to women’s subordination, they were equally concerned with documenting women’s experiences. As in the origins debate, however, early scholarship on colonial women defined its historical constituency narrowly, women’s historians focusing mainly on affluent White women.
Over time, however, some initial differences between the approaches taken by scholars in the two fields faded. In the 1980s, historians of race and slavery in colonial America shifted their attention to enslaved people; interest in African American culture grew, thereby bringing enslaved women more prominently into view. Historians of early American women moved in similar directions during the decade and began to consider the effect of racial difference on women’s experience.- GRE - 2025
- Verbal Reasoning
- Reading Comprehension
- The most plausible justification for higher taxes on automobile fuel is that fuel consumption harms the environment and thus adds to the costs of traffic congestion. But the fact that burning fuel creates these “negative externalities” does not imply that no tax on fuel could ever be too high. Economics is precise about the tax that should, in principle, be levied to deal with negative externalities:
the tax on a liter of fuel should be equal to the harm caused by using a liter of fuel.
If the tax is more than that, its costs (including the inconvenience to those who would rather have used their cars) will exceed its benefits (including any reduction in congestion and pollution).- GRE - 2025
- Verbal Reasoning
- Reading Comprehension
- Objectively, of course, the various ecosystems that sustain life on the planet proceed independently of human agency, just as they operated before the hectic ascendancy of Homo sapiens. But it is also true that it is difficult to think of a single such system that has not, for better or worse, been substantially modified by human culture. Nor is this simply the work of the industrial centuries. It has been happening since the days of ancient Mesopotamia. It is coeval with the origins of writing, and has occurred throughout our social existence. And it is this irreversibly modified world, from the polar caps to the equatorial forests, that is all the nature we have.
- GRE - 2025
- Verbal Reasoning
- Reading Comprehension
View More Questions
Questions Asked in GMAT exam
- If y = 3, then y³(y³-y) =
- GMAT - 2025
- Algebra
If \(8x + 5x + 2x + 4x = 114\), then, \(5x + 3 = ?\)
- GMAT - 2025
- Algebra
If \(r = 5 z\) then \(15 z = 3 y,\) then \(r =\)
- GMAT - 2025
- Algebra
- Solve the following equation for A: 2A/3 = 8 + 4A
- GMAT - 2025
- Algebra
- Over the past 7 weeks, the Smith family had weekly grocery bills of $74, $69, $64, $79, $64, $84, and $77. What was the Smiths' average (arithmetic mean) weekly grocery bill over the 7-week period?
- GMAT - 2025
- Averages
View More Questions