Comprehension
In the 1970s, two debates engaged many scholars of early United States history. One focused on the status of women, primarily White women. Turning on the so-called golden age theory, which posited that during the eighteenth-century colonial era, American women enjoyed a brief period of high status relative to their English contemporaries and to nineteenth-century American women, this debate pitted scholars who believed women’s lives deteriorated after 1800 against those who thought women’s lives had been no better before 1800. At issue were the causes of women’s subordination: were these causes already in place when the English first settled North America or did they emerge with the rise of nineteenth-century industrial capitalism?

The second debate, the so-called origins debate, concerned the emergence of racial slavery in the southern colonies: was slavery the inevitable result of the deep-rooted racial prejudice of early British colonists or did racial prejudice arise only after these planters instituted slave labor?

Although these debates are parallel in some respects, key differences distinguished them. Whereas the debate over women’s status revolved around implicit comparisons of colonial women to their counterparts in the antebellum period (1800--1860), thus inviting comment from scholars of both historical periods, the origins debate was primarily confined to a discussion about slavery in colonial America. Second, in contrast to the newness of the debate over women’s status and its continued currency throughout the early 1980s, the debate over race and slavery, begun in the 1950s, had lost some of its urgency with the publication of Morgan’s American Slavery, American Freedom (1975), widely regarded as the last word on the subject.

Each debate also assumed a different relationship to the groups whose histories it concerned. In its heyday, the origins debate focused mainly on White attitudes toward Africans rather than on Africans themselves. With few exceptions, such as Wood’s Black Majority (1974) and Mullin’s Flight and Rebellion (1972), which were centrally concerned with enslaved African men, most works pertaining to the origins debate focused on the White architects, mostly male, of racial slavery. In contrast, although women’s historians were interested in the institutions and ideologies contributing to women’s subordination, they were equally concerned with documenting women’s experiences. As in the origins debate, however, early scholarship on colonial women defined its historical constituency narrowly, women’s historians focusing mainly on affluent White women.

Over time, however, some initial differences between the approaches taken by scholars in the two fields faded. In the 1980s, historians of race and slavery in colonial America shifted their attention to enslaved people; interest in African American culture grew, thereby bringing enslaved women more prominently into view. Historians of early American women moved in similar directions during the decade and began to consider the effect of racial difference on women’s experience.
Question: 1

The passage is primarily concerned with: 

Show Hint

For “main idea” questions, focus on what the entire passage accomplishes, not just one paragraph.
Updated On: Oct 3, 2025
  • Showing how historians who were engaged in a particular debate influenced historians engaged in another debate
  • Explaining why two initially parallel scholarly debates diverged in the 1980s
  • Comparing two scholarly debates and discussing their histories
  • Contrasting the narrow focus of one scholarly debate with the somewhat broader focus of another
  • Evaluating the relative merits of the approaches used by historians engaged in two overlapping scholarly debates 
     

Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is C

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: Identify the purpose of the passage. 
The passage describes two debates: one about women’s status and one about the origins of racial slavery. It outlines their content, scope, differences, and evolution. 
Step 2: Evaluate options. 
- (A): Influence is not the focus. 
- (B): The debates did not diverge in the 1980s; they actually became similar. 
- (C): Correct, the passage compares and traces their histories. 
- (D): Contrast alone is not enough; the passage does more. 
- (E): No evaluation of merits, just description. 
Step 3: Conclusion. 
Hence, the answer is (C). 
 

Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 2

It can be inferred that the author of the passage mentions American Slavery, American Freedom in the second paragraph primarily in order to:

Show Hint

When a specific book is cited in a passage, ask: is it an example, evidence, or explanation? Here, it explains the decline in urgency of a debate.
Updated On: Oct 3, 2025
  • Substantiate a point about the methodology that came to be prevalent among scholars engaged in the origins debate
  • Cite a major influence on those scholars who claimed that racial prejudice preceded the institution of slavery in colonial America
  • Show that some scholars who were engaged in the origins debate prior to the 1980s were interested in the experiences of enslaved people
  • Identify a reason for a certain difference in the late 1970s between the origins debate and the debate over American women’s status
  • Contrast the kind of work produced by scholars engaged in the origins debate with the kind produced by scholars engaged in the debate over American women’s status 
     

Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is D

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: Recall the passage. 
The text says the origins debate lost urgency after the publication of Morgan’s \emph{American Slavery, American Freedom}, which was regarded as the “last word” on the subject. 
Step 2: Match options. 
- (A): Not about methodology. 
- (B): Not framed as influence on prejudice claims. 
- (C): Not about enslaved people’s experiences. 
- (D): Correct—explains why the origins debate had declined in urgency compared to the women’s debate. 
- (E): No such contrast is made here. 
Step 3: Conclusion. 
Answer is (D). 
 

Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 3

The passage suggests which of the following about the women’s historians mentioned in the third paragraph? 

Show Hint

When a passage mentions multiple groups of historians, look for parallels in their research focus to answer comparison questions.
Updated On: Oct 3, 2025
  • They disputed certain claims regarding the status of eighteenth-century American women relative to women in England during the same period.
  • Their approach to the study of women’s subordination had been partly influenced by earlier studies published by some scholars engaged in the origins debate.
  • Their work focused on the experiences of both White and African American women.
  • Their approach resembled the approach taken in studies by Wood and by Mullin in that they were interested in the experiences of people subjected to a system of subordination.
  • To some extent, they concurred with Wood and with Mullin about the origins of racism in colonial America. 
     

Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is D

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: Recall the third paragraph. 
It says women’s historians studied institutions and ideologies but were equally concerned with women’s actual experiences. 
Step 2: Compare with Wood and Mullin. 
Wood’s and Mullin’s works focused on enslaved people’s experiences. Both approaches highlight the lived experiences of subordinated groups. 
Step 3: Analyze options. 
- (A): Not stated. 
- (B): No direct influence mentioned. 
- (C): They focused mainly on affluent White women, not both races. 
- (D): Correct, both studied lived experiences under subordination. 
- (E): Racism origins not connected here. 
Step 4: Conclusion. 
Answer is (D). 
 

Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 4

According to the passage, historical studies of race and slavery in early America that were produced during the 1980s differed from studies of that subject produced prior to the 1980s in that the studies produced during the 1980s: 

Show Hint

When comparing scholarship “before vs. after” a certain period, underline what changed in the final paragraph—it usually points directly to the correct answer.
Updated On: Oct 3, 2025
  • gave more attention to the experiences of enslaved women
  • gave less attention to the cultures of enslaved people
  • were read by more scholars in other fields
  • were more concerned with the institutions and ideologies that perpetuated racial prejudice in postcolonial America
  • made direct comparisons between the subordination of White women and the subordination of African American people 
     

Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is A

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: Recall the relevant passage portion. 
The last paragraph of the passage notes that in the 1980s, historians of race and slavery “shifted their attention to enslaved people; interest in African American culture grew, thereby bringing enslaved women more prominently into view.” 
Step 2: Compare with pre-1980s scholarship. 
Earlier works (before the 1980s) focused primarily on White architects of slavery and on White attitudes toward Africans, with limited attention to enslaved people themselves. Only exceptions, such as Wood and Mullin, highlighted enslaved men. 
Step 3: Analyze options. 
- (A): Correct—1980s scholarship brought enslaved women into focus. 
- (B): Incorrect—attention to enslaved cultures actually increased, not decreased. 
- (C): No mention of readership across fields. 
- (D): Incorrect—the passage describes ideologies of subordination for women’s historians, not specifically for slavery in postcolonial America. 
- (E): Incorrect—no such direct comparisons are described. 
Step 4: Conclusion. 
The key difference is (A): more attention to enslaved women. 
 

Was this answer helpful?
0
0

Top Questions on Reading Comprehension

View More Questions