Comprehension

The earliest controversies about the relationship between photography and art centered on whether photography's fidelity to appearances and dependence on a machine allowed it to be a fine art as distinct from
LINE(5) merely a practical art. Throughout the nineteenth century, the defense of photography was identical with the struggle to establish it as a fine art. Against the charge that photography was a soulless, mechanical copying of reality, photographers asserted that it was instead a privileged 
LINE(10)way of seeing, a revolt against commonplace vision, and no less worthy an art than painting. 
Ironically, now that photography is securely established as a fine art, many photographers find it pretentious or irrelevant to label it as such. Serious photographers variously 
LINE(15) claim to be finding, recording, impartially observing, witnessing events, exploring themselves — anything but making works of art. In the nineteenth century, photography's association with the real world placed it in an ambivalent relation to art; late in the twentieth 
LINE(20)century, an ambivalent relation exists because of the Modernist heritage in art. That important photographers are no longer willing to debate whether photography is or is not a fine art, except to proclaim that their own work is not involved with art, shows the extent to which 
LINE(25)they simply take for granted the concept of art imposed by the triumph of Modernism: the better the art, the more subversive it is of the traditional aims of art. Photographers' disclaimers of any interest in making art tell us more about the harried status of the contemporary 
LINE(30) notion of art than about whether photography is or is not art. For example, those photographers who suppose that, by taking pictures, they are getting away from the pretensions of art as exemplified by painting remind us of those Abstract Expressionist painters who imagined 
LINE(35)they were getting away from the intellectual austerity of classical Modernist painting by concentrating on the physical act of painting. Much of photography's prestige today derives from the convergence of its aims with those of recent art, particularly with the dismissal of abstract 
LINE(40)art implicit in the phenomenon of Pop painting during the 1960's. Appreciating photographs is a relief to sensibilities tired of the mental exertions demanded by abstract art. Classical Modernist painting— that is, abstract art as developed in different ways by Picasso, 
LINE(45)Kandinsky, and Matisse— presupposes highly developed skills of looking and a familiarity with other paintings and the history of art. Photography, like Pop painting, reassures viewers that art is not hard; photography seems to be more about its subjects than about art. 
LINE(50) Photography, however, has developed all the anxieties and self-consciousness of a classic Modernist art. Many professionals privately have begun to worry that the pro- motion of photography as an activity subversive of the traditional pretensions of art has gone so far that the 
LINE (55)public will forget that photography is a distinctive and exalted activity— in short, an art.

Question: 1

In the passage, the author is primarily concerned with

Show Hint

For main idea questions, look for an answer that encompasses the beginning, middle, and end of the passage. Options that focus on only one paragraph are usually too narrow to be the primary concern.
Updated On: Oct 1, 2025
  • defining the Modernist attitude toward art
  • explaining how photography emerged as a fine art after the controversies of the nineteenth century
  • explaining the attitudes of serious contemporary photographers toward photography as art and placing those attitudes in their historical context
  • defining the various approaches that serious contemporary photographers take toward their art and assessing the value of each of those approaches
  • identifying the ways that recent movements in painting and sculpture have influenced the techniques employed by serious photographers
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is C

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: Understanding the Concept:
This is a main idea question. It asks for the primary focus of the entire passage. We need to find the option that best summarizes the author's overall project.
Step 2: Detailed Explanation:
The passage begins by outlining the historical (19th-century) debate about photography as art. It then introduces an "irony": contemporary photographers now reject the "art" label. The rest of the passage is dedicated to explaining this modern attitude. The author analyzes this stance by placing it within the "Modernist heritage in art" (line 20), comparing it to other art movements like Abstract Expressionism and Pop art. The author is therefore explaining a current phenomenon (the attitudes of photographers) by analyzing its historical and theoretical context.
Let's evaluate the options:
\begin{itemize} \item (A) This is part of the explanation, but the focus is specifically on photography, not just Modernism in general.
\item (B) This is only the topic of the first paragraph; the passage's main focus is on the contemporary situation.
\item (C) This accurately describes the two main parts of the author's argument: explaining the current attitudes and providing the historical context (both 19th-century and Modernist) for them.
\item (D) The author describes a general attitude of disclaiming art, not "various approaches," and is more concerned with explaining this attitude than "assessing its value."
\item (E) The passage discusses influence on photography's aims and prestige, not its specific "techniques." \end{itemize} Step 3: Final Answer:
The passage is primarily concerned with explaining the modern photographer's attitude toward art by placing it in a historical context.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 2

Which of the following adjectives best describes "the concept of art imposed by the triumph of Modernism" as the author represents it in lines 25-27?

Show Hint

When a question points to specific lines, reread them carefully and try to define the key terms. Here, understanding "subversive" is key to recognizing the paradoxical nature of the statement.
Updated On: Oct 1, 2025
  • Objective
  • Mechanical
  • Superficial
  • Dramatic
  • Paradoxical
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: Understanding the Concept:
This is a detail/inference question that asks us to characterize a specific concept described in the text. We must analyze the author's description in the cited lines.
Step 2: Detailed Explanation:
The lines in question (25-27) describe the Modernist concept of art as one where "the better the art, the more subversive it is of the traditional aims of art." A subversive act is one that undermines or overthrows something established. So, Modernist art, in this view, becomes better by working against the traditional definition of art.
This is a self-contradictory or seemingly absurd statement, which is the definition of a paradox. The idea that to be a great example of something (art), one must undermine that very thing is paradoxical.
Let's evaluate the options:
\begin{itemize} \item (A) Objective: The concept is about subverting tradition, which is a subjective goal, not an objective one.
\item (B) Mechanical: This relates to the 19th-century critique of photography, not the Modernist concept of art.
\item (C) Superficial: The author treats this concept with seriousness, suggesting it is complex, not superficial.
\item (D) Dramatic: While the idea might be dramatic, "paradoxical" is a much more precise description of its logical structure.
\item (E) Paradoxical: This perfectly describes the contradictory nature of the concept that art improves by subverting itself. \end{itemize} Step 3: Final Answer:
The concept that good art must subvert the aims of traditional art is best described as paradoxical.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 3

The author introduces Abstract Expressionist painters (lines 34) in order to

Show Hint

When a passage says "X reminds us of Y," it is explicitly setting up an analogy. Understand the key similarity the author is highlighting to determine the purpose of the comparison.
Updated On: Oct 1, 2025
  • provide an example of artists who, like serious contemporary photographers, disavowed traditionally accepted aims of modern art
  • call attention to artists whose works often bear a physical resemblance to the works of serious contemporary photographers
  • set forth an analogy between the Abstract Expressionist painters and classical Modernist painters
  • provide a contrast to Pop artists and others who created works that exemplify the Modernist heritage in art
  • provide an explanation of why serious photography, like other contemporary visual forms, is not and should not pretend to be an art
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is A

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: Understanding the Concept:
This question asks for the rhetorical purpose of mentioning a specific group. We need to understand why the author brought up Abstract Expressionists in the context of the argument about photography.
Step 2: Detailed Explanation:
The author introduces the painters with the phrase: "...photographers who suppose that...they are getting away from the pretensions of art...remind us of those Abstract Expressionist painters who imagined they were getting away from...painting..." (lines 31-36).
This is a direct comparison. The author is saying that photographers' claims to be "getting away from art" are similar to the claims made by Abstract Expressionists. Both groups disavowed or rejected the "pretensions" or traditional aims of art. The purpose of this comparison is to show that the photographers' attitude is part of a larger trend within Modernist art.
Let's evaluate the options:
\begin{itemize} \item (A) This accurately states the analogy. Both groups (photographers and Abstract Expressionists) "disavowed traditionally accepted aims" of art.
\item (B) The passage does not mention any physical resemblance.
\item (C) The passage contrasts the Abstract Expressionists with "classical Modernist painting," it does not create an analogy between them.
\item (D) This is incorrect; they are presented as an example of the Modernist heritage, not a contrast to it.
\item (E) The author's ultimate point is that photography is an art. This example serves to explain the photographers' behavior within the context of art, not to argue that it isn't art. \end{itemize} Step 3: Final Answer:
The Abstract Expressionists are introduced as an analogy to contemporary photographers, as both groups claimed to be rejecting the traditional pretensions of art.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 4

According to the author, the nineteenth-century defenders of photography mentioned in the passage stressed that photography was

Show Hint

For "according to the author" questions, the answer is almost always directly stated in the text. Scan the relevant section of the passage for keywords from the question to locate the exact sentence that provides the answer.
Updated On: Oct 1, 2025
  • a means of making people familiar with remote locales and unfamiliar things
  • a technologically advanced activity
  • a device for observing the world impartially
  • an art comparable to painting
  • an art that would eventually replace the traditional arts
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is D

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: Understanding the Concept:
This is a detail question asking about a specific point made in the first paragraph. We need to find what the "defenders of photography" in the 19th century asserted.
Step 2: Detailed Explanation:
The first paragraph describes the 19th-century debate. It states, "Against the charge that photography was a soulless, mechanical copying of reality, photographers asserted that it was instead a privileged way of seeing...and no less worthy an art than painting." (lines 8-11).
This phrase directly states their main argument: that photography was an art form that was just as valuable and worthy as painting.
Let's evaluate the options based on this text:
\begin{itemize} \item (A) This is a use of photography, but not the specific argument mentioned in the passage.
\item (B) While true, their defense focused on its artistic merit, not its technological aspect.
\item (C) "Impartially observing" is a claim made by contemporary photographers (line 15), not the 19th-century defenders.
\item (D) This is a direct paraphrase of "no less worthy an art than painting."
\item (E) The passage does not state that they claimed photography would replace other arts. \end{itemize} Step 3: Final Answer:
The passage explicitly states that 19th-century defenders argued photography was "no less worthy an art than painting."
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 5

According to the passage, which of the following best explains the reaction of serious contemporary photographers to the question of whether photography is an art?

Show Hint

Look for sentences where the author explicitly provides a reason or explanation. Phrases like "because of," "shows the extent to which," or "the reason is" are strong indicators of where to find the answer to a "why" question.
Updated On: Oct 1, 2025
  • The photographers' belief that their reliance on an impersonal machine to produce their art requires the surrender of the authority of their personal vision
  • The photographers' fear that serious photography may not be accepted as an art by the contemporary art public
  • The influence of Abstract Expressionist painting and Pop Art on the subject matter of the modern photograph
  • The photographers' belief that the best art is subversive of art as it has previously been defined
  • The notorious difficulty of defining art in its relation to realistic representation
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is D

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: Understanding the Concept:
This question asks for the reason behind the attitude of contemporary photographers. We need to find the explanation the author provides for why they disclaim the "art" label.
Step 2: Detailed Explanation:
The author directly addresses this in the second paragraph. After describing how photographers now reject the "art" label, the author explains that this is a consequence of the "Modernist heritage." The author states that their unwillingness to debate the question "shows the extent to which they simply take for granted the concept of art imposed by the triumph of Modernism: the better the art, the more subversive it is of the traditional aims of art." (lines 24-27).
This means that photographers reject the label "art" because, in their Modernist view, the goal of a serious artist is to subvert or work against traditional notions of art. Claiming their work isn't art is their way of being good Modernist artists.
Let's evaluate the options:
\begin{itemize} \item (A) This refers to the 19th-century debate, not the contemporary one.
\item (B) The author states the opposite: "photography is securely established as a fine art" (lines 12-13).
\item (C) The influence of other movements is mentioned as a parallel phenomenon, but the core reason is the underlying Modernist belief about what art should be.
\item (D) This is a direct paraphrase of the explanation given in lines 25-27.
\item (E) This is too general. The author provides a very specific explanation based on the principles of Modernism. \end{itemize} Step 3: Final Answer:
The author explains that the photographers' reaction stems from the Modernist belief that the best art is that which subverts previous definitions of art.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 6

According to the passage, certain serious contemporary photographers expressly make which of the following claims about their photographs?

Show Hint

Questions with the word "expressly" or "explicitly" point you to information that is directly stated in the text, not inferred. Find the exact sentence that contains the information to ensure your answer is correct.
Updated On: Oct 1, 2025
  • Their photographs could be created by almost anyone who had a camera and the time to devote to the activity.
  • Their photographs are not examples of art but are examples of the photographers' impartial observation of the world.
  • Their photographs are important because of their subjects but not because of the responses they evoke in viewers.
  • Their photographs exhibit the same ageless principles of form and shading that have been used in painting.
  • Their photographs represent a conscious glorification of the mechanical aspects of twentieth-century life.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is B

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: Understanding the Concept:
This is a detail question asking what contemporary photographers explicitly claim about their work. We need to find the sentence that lists their claims.
Step 2: Detailed Explanation:
The second paragraph directly answers this. The author writes: "Serious photographers variously claim to be finding, recording, impartially observing, witnessing events, exploring themselves—anything but making works of art." (lines 14-17).
This sentence provides a list of things they claim to be doing (observing, recording) and explicitly states what they claim not to be doing (making art).
Let's evaluate the options against this text:
\begin{itemize} \item (A) The passage does not mention them making this claim.
\item (B) This option combines two key parts of the quote: that their work is "impartial observation" and that it is "not examples of art" (from the phrase "anything but making works of art"). This is a very accurate summary of their stated claims.
\item (C) The passage does not mention their claims about viewer responses.
\item (D) This is contrary to the Modernist impulse described in the passage.
\item (E) Glorifying the mechanical aspect was a charge made against photography in the 19th century, not a claim made by contemporary photographers. \end{itemize} Step 3: Final Answer:
The passage states directly that contemporary photographers claim their work is impartial observation and anything but art.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 7

It can be inferred from the passage that the author most probably considers serious contemporary photography to be a

Show Hint

To determine the author's opinion, look at the analytical language used. Words like "ironically," "however," and the way the author frames the conclusion reveal their own perspective, which is often more complex than the views of the people described in the passage.
Updated On: Oct 1, 2025
  • contemporary art that is struggling to be accepted as fine art
  • craft requiring sensitivity but by no means an art
  • mechanical copying of reality
  • modern art that displays the Modernist tendency to try to subvert the prevailing aims of art
  • modern art that displays the tendency of all Modernist art to become increasingly formal and abstract
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is D

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: Understanding the Concept:
This question asks for the author's own view of contemporary photography, which must be inferred from the tone and structure of the entire passage.
Step 2: Detailed Explanation:
The author consistently frames the photographers' rejection of the "art" label not as a sign that photography isn't art, but as a symptom of its deep involvement with Modernism. The author calls the situation "ironic" (line 12), states that photography "has developed all the anxieties and self-consciousness of a classic Modernist art" (lines 50-52), and analyzes the photographers' claims through the lens of the Modernist idea that "the better the art, the more subversive it is." The author concludes by worrying that the public will "forget that photography is a distinctive and exalted activity—in short, an art" (lines 55-56).
All of this points to the author's belief that contemporary photography is, in fact, a form of Modernist art, and its practitioners are engaging in the typical Modernist behavior of subverting tradition.
Let's evaluate the options:
\begin{itemize} \item (A) The author explicitly says photography is "securely established as a fine art."
\item (B) and (C) These are 19th-century views that the author presents as outdated. The author's final sentence confirms a belief that it is an "exalted" art.
\item (D) This perfectly summarizes the author's nuanced analysis. The author sees photography as a modern art whose practitioners are acting out a key Modernist tendency: subversion of prevailing artistic aims.
\item (E) The author contrasts photography with abstract art, suggesting it is not on the same path toward abstraction. \end{itemize} Step 3: Final Answer:
The author's analysis throughout the passage indicates a view of contemporary photography as a form of Modernist art that characteristically seeks to subvert traditional art.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0

Top Questions on Reading Comprehension

View More Questions

Questions Asked in GRE exam

View More Questions