Question:
The core limitation with the last line of the passage is that it:
The core limitation with the last line of the passage is that it:
Show Hint
When an argument concludes something is necessary because all known alternatives are insufficient, the key assumption (and potential flaw) is that the list of alternatives is complete. The argument is weakened by the possibility of an unknown alternative.
Updated On: Sep 30, 2025
- assumes that all ancient societies required identical proportions of tin and copper in their bronze alloys.
- relies on the assumption that corrosion has not significantly affected the geochemical analysis of ancient tin ingots.
- underestimates the possibility that ancient societies may have substituted other materials for tin when necessary.
- presumes, without sufficient evidence, that no other tin sources besides those mentioned could have met the demand.
- confuses the presence of rich tin deposits with the certainty that those deposits were actively mined and exported at scale.
Hide Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is D
Solution and Explanation
Step 1: Understanding the Concept
This question asks for a "limitation" or flaw in the passage's conclusion (the "last line"). The passage likely concludes that Britain was a major source of tin *because* other known sources were insufficient. The flaw would be in assuming that the "known" sources are the *only* possible sources.
Step 2: Detailed Explanation
Let's reconstruct the likely argument: 1. The Bronze Age Mediterranean needed a huge amount of tin. 2. Known tin sources in Central Asia were X, Y, Z. 3. Evidence shows British tin was traded. 4. (Last Line Conclusion): Therefore, Britain must have been a major supplier, as sources X, Y, Z were not enough. The limitation in this logic is the jump from "known sources were not enough" to "therefore Britain was a major supplier." This leap contains a hidden assumption. Let's analyze the options:
(A), (B), (C) are potential minor issues but likely not the "core limitation." The argument is about the large-scale origin of tin, not the specifics of alloys, corrosion, or substitution.
(E) is a valid point about geology vs. history, but it might not be the flaw in the *final concluding line* specifically.
(D) perfectly identifies the central flaw. The argument concludes that Britain was essential by appearing to eliminate other possibilities. However, it only considers the currently *mentioned* or *known* sources. The argument's weakness is that it "presumes, without sufficient evidence, that no *other* tin sources... could have met the demand." The existence of a large, yet-to-be-discovered tin source elsewhere would completely undermine the conclusion.
Step 3: Final Answer
The core limitation is that the argument draws a strong conclusion from incomplete knowledge, assuming that the currently identified ancient tin sources are the only ones that ever existed. Option (D) captures this flawed presumption.
This question asks for a "limitation" or flaw in the passage's conclusion (the "last line"). The passage likely concludes that Britain was a major source of tin *because* other known sources were insufficient. The flaw would be in assuming that the "known" sources are the *only* possible sources.
Step 2: Detailed Explanation
Let's reconstruct the likely argument: 1. The Bronze Age Mediterranean needed a huge amount of tin. 2. Known tin sources in Central Asia were X, Y, Z. 3. Evidence shows British tin was traded. 4. (Last Line Conclusion): Therefore, Britain must have been a major supplier, as sources X, Y, Z were not enough. The limitation in this logic is the jump from "known sources were not enough" to "therefore Britain was a major supplier." This leap contains a hidden assumption. Let's analyze the options:
(A), (B), (C) are potential minor issues but likely not the "core limitation." The argument is about the large-scale origin of tin, not the specifics of alloys, corrosion, or substitution.
(E) is a valid point about geology vs. history, but it might not be the flaw in the *final concluding line* specifically.
(D) perfectly identifies the central flaw. The argument concludes that Britain was essential by appearing to eliminate other possibilities. However, it only considers the currently *mentioned* or *known* sources. The argument's weakness is that it "presumes, without sufficient evidence, that no *other* tin sources... could have met the demand." The existence of a large, yet-to-be-discovered tin source elsewhere would completely undermine the conclusion.
Step 3: Final Answer
The core limitation is that the argument draws a strong conclusion from incomplete knowledge, assuming that the currently identified ancient tin sources are the only ones that ever existed. Option (D) captures this flawed presumption.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Top Questions on Reading Comprehension
For the past two years at FasCorp, there has been a policy to advertise any job opening to current employees and to give no job to an applicant from outside the company if a FasCorp employee applies who is qualified for the job. This policy has been strictly followed, yet even though numerous employees of FasCorp have been qualified for any given entry-level position, some entry-level jobs have been filled with people from outside the company.
If the information provided is true, which of the following must on the basis of it also be true about FasCorp during the past two years?- GRE - 2025
- Verbal Reasoning
- Reading Comprehension
As an example of the devastation wrought on music publishers by the photocopier, one executive noted that for a recent choral festival with 1,200 singers, the festival’s organizing committee purchased only 12 copies of the music published by her company that was 5 performed as part of the festival.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the support the example lends to the executive’s contention that music publishers have been devastated by the photocopier?- GRE - 2025
- Verbal Reasoning
- Reading Comprehension
- In the 1970s, two debates engaged many scholars of early United States history. One focused on the status of women, primarily White women. Turning on the so-called golden age theory, which posited that during the eighteenth-century colonial era, American women enjoyed a brief period of high status relative to their English contemporaries and to nineteenth-century American women, this debate pitted scholars who believed women’s lives deteriorated after 1800 against those who thought women’s lives had been no better before 1800. At issue were the causes of women’s subordination: were these causes already in place when the English first settled North America or did they emerge with the rise of nineteenth-century industrial capitalism?
The second debate, the so-called origins debate, concerned the emergence of racial slavery in the southern colonies: was slavery the inevitable result of the deep-rooted racial prejudice of early British colonists or did racial prejudice arise only after these planters instituted slave labor?
Although these debates are parallel in some respects, key differences distinguished them. Whereas the debate over women’s status revolved around implicit comparisons of colonial women to their counterparts in the antebellum period (1800--1860), thus inviting comment from scholars of both historical periods, the origins debate was primarily confined to a discussion about slavery in colonial America. Second, in contrast to the newness of the debate over women’s status and its continued currency throughout the early 1980s, the debate over race and slavery, begun in the 1950s, had lost some of its urgency with the publication of Morgan’s American Slavery, American Freedom (1975), widely regarded as the last word on the subject.
Each debate also assumed a different relationship to the groups whose histories it concerned. In its heyday, the origins debate focused mainly on White attitudes toward Africans rather than on Africans themselves. With few exceptions, such as Wood’s Black Majority (1974) and Mullin’s Flight and Rebellion (1972), which were centrally concerned with enslaved African men, most works pertaining to the origins debate focused on the White architects, mostly male, of racial slavery. In contrast, although women’s historians were interested in the institutions and ideologies contributing to women’s subordination, they were equally concerned with documenting women’s experiences. As in the origins debate, however, early scholarship on colonial women defined its historical constituency narrowly, women’s historians focusing mainly on affluent White women.
Over time, however, some initial differences between the approaches taken by scholars in the two fields faded. In the 1980s, historians of race and slavery in colonial America shifted their attention to enslaved people; interest in African American culture grew, thereby bringing enslaved women more prominently into view. Historians of early American women moved in similar directions during the decade and began to consider the effect of racial difference on women’s experience.- GRE - 2025
- Verbal Reasoning
- Reading Comprehension
- The most plausible justification for higher taxes on automobile fuel is that fuel consumption harms the environment and thus adds to the costs of traffic congestion. But the fact that burning fuel creates these “negative externalities” does not imply that no tax on fuel could ever be too high. Economics is precise about the tax that should, in principle, be levied to deal with negative externalities:
the tax on a liter of fuel should be equal to the harm caused by using a liter of fuel.
If the tax is more than that, its costs (including the inconvenience to those who would rather have used their cars) will exceed its benefits (including any reduction in congestion and pollution).- GRE - 2025
- Verbal Reasoning
- Reading Comprehension
- Objectively, of course, the various ecosystems that sustain life on the planet proceed independently of human agency, just as they operated before the hectic ascendancy of Homo sapiens. But it is also true that it is difficult to think of a single such system that has not, for better or worse, been substantially modified by human culture. Nor is this simply the work of the industrial centuries. It has been happening since the days of ancient Mesopotamia. It is coeval with the origins of writing, and has occurred throughout our social existence. And it is this irreversibly modified world, from the polar caps to the equatorial forests, that is all the nature we have.
- GRE - 2025
- Verbal Reasoning
- Reading Comprehension
View More Questions
Questions Asked in GMAT exam
- If y = 3, then y³(y³-y) =
- GMAT - 2025
- Algebra
If \(8x + 5x + 2x + 4x = 114\), then, \(5x + 3 = ?\)
- GMAT - 2025
- Algebra
If \(r = 5 z\) then \(15 z = 3 y,\) then \(r =\)
- GMAT - 2025
- Algebra
- Solve the following equation for A: 2A/3 = 8 + 4A
- GMAT - 2025
- Algebra
- Over the past 7 weeks, the Smith family had weekly grocery bills of $74, $69, $64, $79, $64, $84, and $77. What was the Smiths' average (arithmetic mean) weekly grocery bill over the 7-week period?
- GMAT - 2025
- Averages
View More Questions