Step 1: Understanding the argument.
The argument contends that a city cannot be said to have effective leadership without a strong city council. The conclusion follows that, since Town X is praised for its effective leadership, the city council must be strong in some way, even if it does not wield power directly.
Step 2: Analysis of options.
- (A) This is the correct conclusion. It emphasizes that for Town X to be praised for effective leadership, it must be true that the city council does not directly wield the power, which the argument implies is the case.
- (B) This option contradicts the argument, as the passage specifically states that the mayor's office holds the real power, not the city council.
- (C) This is not supported by the argument, as the city council's role is not to unilaterally support decisions but rather to have deliberative discussions.
- (D) While the council is deliberative, the argument doesn't say it's typical of most deliberative bodies.
- (E) The argument doesn't support the idea that deliberation alone bolsters the mayor's leadership; the focus is on the city council's indirect influence.
Step 3: Conclusion.
The correct answer is (A), as it logically completes the argument about the city council's role in Town X's leadership.
If \(8x + 5x + 2x + 4x = 114\), then, \(5x + 3 = ?\)
If \(r = 5 z\) then \(15 z = 3 y,\) then \(r =\)