Here's the explanation:
1. Transformation Objective:
The reaction requires converting propanamide to propanamine, which involves reducing the amide group (-CONH2) to an amine group (-CH2NH2).
2. Reagent Analysis:
A) Excess H2:
While catalytic hydrogenation can reduce some functional groups, it's generally ineffective for directly reducing amides to amines. It requires harsh conditions and may cause unwanted side reactions.
B) Br2 in aqueous NaOH (Hoffmann Bromamide Degradation):
This reagent degrades amides into primary amines with one fewer carbon atom (via an isocyanate intermediate). This would convert propanamide (C3) to ethanamine (C2), which is not the desired product.
C) Iodine in the presence of red phosphorus:
This combination is typically used for reducing carboxylic acids to alkanes and is ineffective for amide-to-amine reduction.
D) LiAlH4 in ether:
Lithium aluminum hydride (LiAlH4) is a powerful reducing agent that directly converts amides to amines by replacing the carbonyl oxygen with hydrogens, making it the ideal choice for this transformation.
Conclusion:
Option (D) LiAlH4 in ether is the only reagent that achieves the desired conversion without altering the carbon chain length.
Final Answer:
The correct answer is (D).
Amines have a lone pair of electrons on the nitrogen atom, due to which they behave as Lewis bases. Greater the value of \( K_b \) or smaller the value of \( pK_b \), stronger is the base. Amines are more basic than alcohols, ethers, esters, etc. The basic character of aliphatic amines should increase with the increase of alkyl substitution. However, it does not occur in a regular manner, as a secondary aliphatic amine is unexpectedly more basic than a tertiary amine in aqueous solutions. Aromatic amines are weaker bases than ammonia and aliphatic amines. Electron-releasing groups such as \( -CH_3 \), \( -NH_2 \), etc., increase the basicity, while electron-withdrawing substituents such as \( -NO_2 \), \( -CN \), halogens, etc., decrease the basicity of amines. The effect of these substituents is more pronounced at the para-position than at the meta-position.
Arrange the following in increasing order of their basic character. Give reason: