Step 1: Understanding the Concept:
This question asks for the specific reason the author gives for finding dreams from existing scientific literature unsuitable for his study. We must locate the relevant sentence in the provided passage about Sigmund Freud.
Step 2: Detailed Explanation:
In the third paragraph of the passage, the author states: "Peculiarities in the material I have used to elucidate the interpretation of dreams have rendered this publication difficult. The work itself will demonstrate why all dreams related in scientific literature or collected by others had to remain useless for my purpose."
This sentence explicitly tells the reader that the explanation is not contained within this introductory passage. Instead, the author defers the reasoning to the main body of his work. He states that the work itself will make it clear why other sources were "useless."
Let's analyze the options:
- (A), (B), (E): These are plausible reasons why a scientist might reject prior data, but the author does not mention any of them in this passage.
- (D): The passage implies that scientific literature on dreams did exist, but it was "useless," not that it was nonexistent.
- (C): This option accurately reflects the author's statement. He doesn't give the reason now but promises that the main work will provide it.
Step 3: Final Answer:
The author explicitly states that the main body of his work will demonstrate why existing literature was not useful. Therefore, he does not give a direct reason in this passage.