Step 1: Calculate the original sum of the 10 items. \[ \text{Sum} = \text{Mean} \times \text{Number of items} \] \[ \text{Original Sum} = 5 \times 10 = 50 \]
Step 2: Calculate the total change made to the sum. - For the first seven items, 5 is added to each. Total increase = \( 7 \times 5 = 35 \). - For the last three items, 3 is subtracted from each. Total decrease = \( 3 \times 3 = 9 \). - The net change in the sum is \( +35 - 9 = 26 \).
Step 3: Calculate the new sum. \[ \text{New Sum} = \text{Original Sum} + \text{Net Change} \] \[ \text{New Sum} = 50 + 26 = 76 \]
Step 4: Calculate the new mean. The number of items remains 10. \[ \text{New Mean} = \frac{\text{New Sum}}{\text{Number of items}} = \frac{76}{10} = 7.6 \]
The coefficient of correlation of the above two data series will be equal to \(\underline{\hspace{1cm}}\)
\[\begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline X & Y \\ \hline -3 & 9 \\ -2 & 4 \\ -1 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 \\ 1 & 1 \\ 2 & 4 \\ 3 & 9 \\ \hline \end{array}\]
Identify the median class for the following grouped data:
\[\begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline \textbf{Class interval} & \textbf{Frequency} \\ \hline 5-10 & 5 \\ 10-15 & 15 \\ 15-20 & 22 \\ 20-25 & 25 \\ 25-30 & 10 \\ 30-35 & 3 \\ \hline \end{array}\]
Match the LIST-I (Spectroscopy) with LIST-II (Application)
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Visible light spectroscopy | III. Identification on the basis of color |
B. Fluorescence spectroscopy | IV. Identification on the basis of fluorophore present |
C. FTIR spectroscopy | I. Identification on the basis of absorption in infrared region |
D. Mass Spectroscopy | II. Identification on the basis of m/z ion |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Forensic Psychiatry | III. Behavioural pattern of criminal |
B. Forensic Engineering | IV. Origin of metallic fracture |
C. Forensic Odontology | I. Bite marks analysis |
D. Computer Forensics | II. Information derived from digital devices |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Calvin Goddard | II. Forensic Ballistics |
B. Karl Landsteiner | III. Blood Grouping |
C. Albert Osborn | IV. Document examination |
D. Mathieu Orfila | I. Forensic Toxicology |
Match the LIST-I (Evidence, etc.) with LIST-II (Example, Construction etc.)
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Biological evidence | IV. Blood |
B. Latent print evidence | III. Fingerprints |
C. Trace evidence | II. Soil |
D. Digital evidence | I. Cell phone records |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Ridges | III. The raised portion of the friction skin of the fingers |
B. Type Lines | I. Two most inner ridges which start parallel, diverge and surround or tend to surround the pattern area |
C. Delta | IV. The ridge characteristics nearest to the point of divergence of type lines |
D. Enclosure | II. A single ridge bifurcates and reunites to enclose some space |