Comprehension

Teknik Group of industries had businesses in different sectors ranging from manufacturing, construction, fish farming and hotels. These different businesses operated as semi-independent units managed by the unit level managers. Teknik’s management had an internal consultancy group called the Business Advisory Group (known internally as BAG). The 15 experts in BAG were hired personally by Mr. Teknikwala, the owner of Teknik, who wanted this core group of experts to help his organization grow fast without facing the typical growth hurdles. Most of them were specialists in fields like law, information technology, human resource management, and operations management. Almost all of them had experience spanning decades in the in dustry. Whenever any of the units faced any significant issues, it represented an extra workload for those who were involved. This coordination was required to understand the different work processes and the users’ requirements. This coordination activity was being extensively man aged by the old timers as they were familiar with internal processes and people in the different units. An external consultant was also hired for customization and implementation. 
After two months, BAG teams had to fortnightly present their progress to Ms. Teknikwala’s team. In the last meeting Ms. Teknikwala was dissatisfied. She explained her thinking that since ERP impacted every aspect of the business, the roll out had to be done faster. She wanted Mr. Shiv to get the implementation completed ahead of schedule. In the meeting she asked Mr. Shiv to get the people in IT team to be more productive. Not willing to disagree, Mr. Shiv committed to a roll-out schedule of complete ERP system in 6 months instead of earlier decided 14 months. Next day, Mr. Shiv presented the revised project milestone to BAG members. He told them that in order to meet the deadline, the members were expected to work on week-ends till the completion of the project. Along with that, they were also expected to maintain their earlier standards of delivery time and quality for the normal trouble-shooting and internal advisory work. Mr. Shiv also pointed out that anyone whose performance did not meet the expectations would be subjected to formal disciplinary action. The meeting ended without any member commenting on Shiv’s ideas, although Mr. Shiv heard a lot of mumbling in the corridor. Over the week, Shiv noticed that the members seemed to avoid him and he had to make extra effort to get ideas from them.
After a fortnight Shiv reviewed the attendance register and found that Mr. Lal, an old time member, had not come during the week-ends and certain decisions were held up due to lack of inputs from Mr. Lal. Mr. Shiv issued a written reprimand to Mr. Lal. He was speechless on receiving the reprimand but kept silent. It has been three days since that incident. Some of the senior members had put in request for transfer to other business units. It was rumoured that four problems, the unit level managers would put up a request for help to BAG. The prob lems ranged from installation of internal MIS systems, to financial advice related to leasing of equipment, to handling of employee grievances.
Over a period of 20 years, Teknik’s revenues grew from 100 crore to 10,000 crore with guid ance of BAG and due to Mr. Tekinkwala’s vision. Given its reputation in the industry, many people wanted to start their careers in BAG. Often young MBAs fresh out of business schools would apply. However their applications used to be rejected by Mr. Tekinkwala, who had a preference for people with extensive industry experience. Things changed after the unfortunate demise of Mr. Tekinkwala. His daughter Ms. Teknikwali took up the family business. She was an MBA from one of the premier business schools, and was working in a different company when Mr. Tekinkwala passed away. She preferred that BAG developed new ideas and therefore inducted freshly graduated MBAs from premier business schools. She personally supervised the recruitment and selection process. Now the entire group constituted of 50 specialists, out of which 35 were the old time members. She also changed the reporting relationships in the BAG group with some of the older members being made to report to the new members. In IT team, Mr. Shiv, a newly recruited MBA, was made in-charge. For the older members it was a shock. However, as most of them were on the verge of retirement, and it would be challenging to search for new jobs while competing with younger professionals, they decided to play along. After one month, all business units were caught up in the ERP fever. This was an idea pushed by Ms. Teknikwali who felt the need to replace the old legacy systems with latest ERP system integrating all the units of Teknik. This was heavily influenced by her experience in the previ ous company where an ERP system was already up and running. Therefore she was not aware of the difference between installing an ERP system and working on an already installed one.
The ERP implementation in Teknik Group required extensive coordination with senior level managers of senior legal experts had agreed on an offer from a law firm. Other senior members would sporadically come in late to work, citing health reasons. Almost all senior members now wanted a weekly work-routine to be prepared and given to them in advance so that they could deliver as per the schedule. This insistence on written communication was a problem as urgent problems or ad-hoc requests could not be foreseen and included. Also normal services to other business units were being unattended to, and there were complaints coming from the unit heads.

Question: 1

Which of the following could have been a better response of Mr. Shiv to Ms. Teknikwali’s request to re-schedule the ERP implementation?

Show Hint

- For complex change (ERP), \textbf{co-create} the plan with affected teams and run a quick feasibility check before committing dates.
Updated On: Dec 6, 2025
  • Look at industry best practices regarding fast-tracking of ERP projects and then commit to a new deadline.
  • Consult the external consultant who was involved with ERP customization and implementation.
  • Create a smaller team of all the new recruits of BAG and present the idea to them alone.
  • Eliminate the reliance on external consultants as they would be slow.
  • Present the idea to BAG members and ask them to look at the feasibility of the entire plan.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: The case shows heavy dependence on the old BAG members for coordination and domain knowledge; unilateral commitment by Shiv backfired.
Step 2: A better response must secure buy-in and assess capacity before revising deadlines. Option (E) does both: it involves all stakeholders and checks feasibility.
Step 3: (A) still commits first and consults later; (B) consults only the external partner, ignoring key internal stakeholders; (C) excludes experienced old members; (D) is impractical and risky during an ERP rollout.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 2

Which of the following can be identified as the immediate cause for the problems in BAG?

Show Hint

- Sudden unilateral scope/time changes typically cause resistance; align first, then announce.
Updated On: Dec 6, 2025
  • Ms. Teknikwali’s decision to appoint Mr. Shiv as project lead for ERP implementation.
  • The incompetence of the consultant who was implementing the ERP project.
  • Lack of information about what was happening in the ERP project.
  • Infighting between new recruits and the older members of BAG group.
  • Unilateral decision making by Shiv.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: Problems escalated after Shiv alone shortened the timeline, mandated weekend work, and threatened discipline without team consultation.
Step 2: This triggered disengagement, avoidance, transfer requests, and delays—hence the immediate cause is (E), not structural choices like (A) or vague issues like (C).
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 3

How should Mr. Shiv cope with the situation now? Choose the best option, considering Mr. Shiv’s career would be at stake if the ERP project fails, and assuming he has the authority to act.

Show Hint

- When timelines compress, \textbf{add capacity and prioritize}—don’t just push harder.
Updated On: Dec 6, 2025
  • Resign from BAG and join another company.
  • Inform Ms. Teknikwali and seek help to discipline old members.
  • Align new members by promising rewards at project end.
  • Develop work-routines aligned to ERP requirements. Hire extra resources for ad-hoc work and for ERP requirements.
  • Create a joint team and send them to out-bound programmes on weekends.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is D

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: The pain points are overload and unattended BAU (business-as-usual) tasks.
Step 2: Option (D) directly fixes capacity (hire extra help) and clarifies schedules (work-routines) without antagonizing staff—most pragmatic path to rescue delivery.
Step 3: (A) abdicates; (B) escalates conflict; (C) is superficial; (E) does not address workload or timelines.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 4

Of all the problems being faced in BAG, which of the following is neither discussed nor hinted at?

Show Hint

- For “neither discussed nor hinted,” eliminate any option even loosely supported by the narrative.
Updated On: Dec 6, 2025
  • Ms. Teknikwali’s lack of faith in older members to implement new ideas.
  • The inability of the younger members to work along with the older members of BAG.
  • Mr. Shiv’s intention to impress Ms. Teknikwali by agreeing to a tougher deadline.
  • Ms. Teknikwali’s lack of understanding of the complexity of an ERP implementation.
  • Mr. Shiv’s lack of understanding of the sensitivities of the older members of BAG.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is B

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: The case mentions older members’ resentment, Shiv’s unilateral stance, and Ms. Teknikwali’s limited ERP implementation understanding—covering (A), (C), (D), (E).
Step 2: It never states that {younger} members are unable to work with elders; that issue is not discussed nor implied. Hence (B).
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 5

After her father’s demise, the best way Ms. Teknikwali could have gone about dealing with BAG group would have been to:

Show Hint

- New leaders should begin with \textbf{listening tours} to earn credibility before redesigning teams.
Updated On: Dec 6, 2025
  • Discuss with the members their views about the company and solicit ideas on growth.
  • Retire the entire team and hire a fresh team as per her criteria.
  • Hire an external consultant to interact with BAG on her behalf.
  • Ask unit managers about BAG performance first, then discuss with BAG members.
  • Break down BAG into sub-groups and push through what she wanted.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is A

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: A leadership transition needs trust-building and listening, especially with experienced old-timers.
Step 2: Option (A) engages and motivates; other options impose top-down changes or bypass the group, likely worsening resistance.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 6

It can be inferred from the case that implementation of an ERP package in an organization requires creation of a team that has:

Show Hint

- ERP success = \textbf{domain problem-solving} \(\,+\,\) \textbf{current technical know-how}; hire for both, not just seniority or pedigree.
Updated On: Dec 6, 2025
  • a mixture of experienced employees and newly graduated employees
  • only young people with education in top schools and colleges
  • sufficient number of people who are networked with powerful stakeholders in the organization
  • right amount of problem solvers along with those who are abreast of the latest ERP technology
  • people who have been involved with operations for a long duration of time along with people who are aware of the latest in ERP technology
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is D

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: The case highlights twin needs: deep process/problem-solving ability (old BAG members’ strength) and up-to-date ERP/IT expertise (new recruits/consultant).
Step 2: Option (D) captures both capability sets without over-specifying age or tenure; (A) and (E) unnecessarily frame it as “experienced vs. fresh.” (B) ignores experience; (C) focuses on influence rather than skills.
Step 3: Hence, the most accurate inference is (D).
Was this answer helpful?
0
0

Top Questions on Caselets

View More Questions