To solve this problem, we need to find the participant fee given the total takings and constraints on the number of participants. The total takings were Rs 38950, and the number of participants is more than 45 but less than 100.
Let the participant fee be represented as f and the number of participants as n. The equation representing the total takings is:
Total Takings = Participant Fee × Number of Participants
This gives us:
f × n = 38950
Constraints:
Given options for f are Rs 410, Rs 450, Rs 500, Rs 510. We test these values to see which satisfies the equation without producing a decimal or non-integer value for n.
Testing option Rs 410:
n = 38950 / 410 = 95
Since 95 is a whole number and within the given range (45 < 95 < 100), Rs 410 is a valid option.
Conclusion:
The participant fee is Rs 410 as it satisfies all conditions of the problem.
Health insurance plays a vital role in ensuring financial protection and access to quality healthcare. In India, however, the extent and nature of health insurance coverage vary significantly between urban and rural areas. While urban populations often have better access to organized insurance schemes, employer-provided coverage, and awareness about health policies, rural populations face challenges such as limited outreach of insurance schemes, inadequate infrastructure, and lower awareness levels. This urban-rural divide in health insurance coverage highlights the broader issue of healthcare inequality, making it essential to analyze the factors contributing to this gap and explore strategies for more inclusive health protection. A state-level health survey was conducted.
The survey covered 1,80,000 adults across urban and rural areas. Urban residents formed 55% of the sample (that is, 99,000 people) while rural residents made up 45% (that is, 81,000 people). In each area, coverage was classified under four heads – Public schemes, Private insurance, Employer-provided coverage, and Uninsured. In urban areas, Public coverage accounted for 28% of the urban population, Private for 22%, Employer for 18%, and the remaining 32% were Uninsured. In rural areas, where formal coverage is generally lower, Public coverage stood at 35%, Private at 10%, Employer at 8%, while 47% were Uninsured.
For this survey, “Insured” includes everyone covered by Public + Private + Employer schemes, and “Uninsured” indicates those with no coverage at all. Officials noted that public schemes remain the backbone of rural coverage, while employer and private plans are relatively more prevalent in urban centres. (250 words)