Statements: All birds are fruits.
Some fruits are towers.
All towers are windows.
Conclusions: I. Some birds are towers.
II. Some windows are birds.
III. Some windows are fruits.
IV. Some towers are birds.
In syllogism-based questions, always check the direct relationships between categories in the statements before drawing conclusions. If a conclusion doesn't directly follow from the given statements, it cannot be considered true.
Only III follows
Let's analyze the given statements and conclusions: - Conclusion I: Some birds are towers.
- This conclusion doesn't follow directly. Since all birds are fruits and some fruits are towers, we cannot conclusively say that some birds are towers.
- Conclusion II: Some windows are birds.
- This conclusion also doesn't follow. All towers are windows, and some fruits are towers, but we can't confirm any direct relationship between windows and birds.
- Conclusion III: Some windows are fruits.
- This conclusion is valid. Since some fruits are towers, and all towers are windows, it follows logically that some windows are fruits.
- Conclusion IV: Some towers are birds.
- This conclusion is not valid. We cannot deduce that some towers are birds from the given statements.
Thus, the correct answer is (d), "Only III follows."
Find the missing code:
L1#1O2~2, J2#2Q3~3, _______, F4#4U5~5, D5#5W6~6
Find the missing number in the table.