To solve this logical reasoning question, we need to analyze the given statements and see if the conclusions follow logically. Let's break down the statements and conclusions:
- Statements:
- Only a few rivers are oceans.
- All oceans are seas.
- All seas are oceans.
- Conclusions:
- I. Some rivers are seas is a possibility.
- II. All rivers are seas is a possibility.
Let's analyze the logical structure:
- The statement "Only a few rivers are oceans" indicates that some rivers can be oceans, but not all. This means there is at least one river that is an ocean.
- "All oceans are seas" implies that whatever is an ocean is also a sea, making every ocean a subset of seas.
- "All seas are oceans" implies a mutual inclusivity between seas and oceans, but logically it can lead to confusion in this context as generally, "all seas are oceans" seems logically incorrect unless considered in a specific philosophical or illustrative manner. Realistically, this is generally interpreted as an error unless justified.
Let’s see how the conclusions fit into this framework:
- Conclusion I: "Some rivers are seas is a possibility."
Given "only a few rivers are oceans" and "all oceans are seas", it's possible for some rivers to be seas if those rivers that are oceans are automatically seas.
Therefore, conclusion I is a possibility and follows. - Conclusion II: "All rivers are seas is a possibility."
This conclusion does not follow. Since only a few rivers are oceans, and therefore, not all rivers can become seas.
Thus, conclusion II does not hold true as a possibility.
Hence, the only logical conclusion that follows is conclusion I. Therefore, the correct option is:
Option: Only I follows