Question

Statement: Should one close relative of a retiring government employee be given a job in government in India?
Arguments:
I. Yes where else will the relatives get a job like this?
II. No, it will close doors of government service to competent and needy youth.

• A. Only I is strong
• B. Only II is strong
• C. Either I or II is strong
• D. Neither I nor II is strong

Answer 1

The Correct Option is A

The question involves evaluating two arguments regarding whether a close relative of a retiring government employee should be given a job in the government. Let's analyze each argument to determine its strength. 

1. Argument I suggests that a close relative should be given a government job since there may be no other opportunity like this for them. This argument assumes that relatives of retiring employees are somehow uniquely disadvantaged in job markets outside of government, which is not inherently valid. No logical base supports this premise universally, and the opportunity for jobs should not depend on familial ties but rather on merit and qualification.
2. Argument II states that such a policy will prevent competent and needy youth from accessing government jobs. This argument is much stronger as it points out a significant drawback of nepotism in government employment. It suggests that prioritizing relatives over competent individuals could lead to inefficiency and unfairness, which is a solid and reasonable concern.

Considering these points, Argument II addresses a broader societal impact and core principles of fairness and meritocracy, making it the stronger argument. Thus, the solution aligns with option:

Only II is strong