Question:

Statement: Should luxury hotels be banned in India?
Course of Action I: Yes. They are places from where international criminals operate.
Course of Action II: No. Affluent foreign tourists will have no place to stay.

Show Hint

Be wary of sweeping generalisations or straw-man rebuttals; CLAT treats such weak general claims as insufficient.
Updated On: Aug 12, 2025
  • Only I follows
  • Only II follows
  • If either I or II follows
  • If neither I nor II follows
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is D

Solution and Explanation

Course I is an overbroad, unsupported generalisation—criminals may use many venues; banning all luxury hotels is not a justified remedy. Course II assumes luxury hotels are the sole accommodation for affluent tourists; this is not necessarily true and does not address the concern of crime. Neither argument reasonably supports or refutes a blanket ban based on the given statement. Hence, neither I nor II follows.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0

Questions Asked in CLAT exam

View More Questions