Question:

Statement: Should a total ban be put on trapping wild animals?
Course of Action I: Yes. Trappers are making a lot of money.
Course of Action II: No. Bans on hunting and trapping are not effective.

Show Hint

Reject arguments that are irrelevant to the central policy concern (e.g., profit) or that dismiss a measure solely on assumed inefficacy without alternatives.
Updated On: Aug 12, 2025
  • Only I follows
  • Only II follows
  • If either I or II follows
  • If neither I nor II follows
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is D

Solution and Explanation

The core issue is conservation and animal welfare; the profit motive (Course I) is irrelevant to whether trapping should be banned. Course II argues inefficacy without weighing ethical/ecological necessity; mere inefficacy does not negate the need for a ban or for alternate enforcement measures. Neither Course I nor II addresses the primary policy consideration (conservation, biodiversity, legal/ethical concerns) adequately. Therefore, neither I nor II follows.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0

Questions Asked in CLAT exam

View More Questions