Question:

Statement:
I. One who has squared a circle is not a mathematician.
II. Therefore, \dots

Show Hint

When a statement is already universal (“Anyone who … is not …”), the valid conclusion is often its direct restatement in set form (“No one who … is …”).
Updated On: Aug 11, 2025
  • No one who has squared a circle is a mathematician
  • All non-mathematicians have squared a circle
  • Some mathematicians have squared a circle
  • All mathematicians square a circle
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is A

Solution and Explanation

The premise states a universal rule: “Anyone who has squared a circle is \emph{not} a mathematician.”
This is equivalent to saying: “No person who has squared a circle belongs to the set of mathematicians.”
Option (a) restates exactly this universal negative and thus follows. Options (b), (c), and (d) introduce claims not supported by the premise.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0

Top Questions on Statements

View More Questions

Questions Asked in CLAT exam

View More Questions