Step 1: Analyze assumption 1:
This is not necessarily true. The rule doesn’t imply that students can't be identified without ID — just that it's a rule to carry it.
Step 2: Analyze assumption 2:
Yes, asking students to carry ID cards logically assumes that they are needed for regulation and security. So, only assumption 2 is valid.
Disregard commonly known facts. Which conclusion would follow on the basis of given statements only?
Statement (I): Some bottles are car. Some cars are cycle.
Conclusion: \[\begin{array}{rl} \bullet & \text{[(I)] Some bottles are cycle is a possibility.} \\ \bullet & \text{[(II)] All bottles are cycle.} \\ \end{array}\]