"Specific Relief" under the Specific Relief Act, 1963 can be granted only for the:
Show Hint
- Enforcing individual Fundamental Rights
- Enforcing individual civil rights as well as criminal rights
- Enforcing individual criminal rights only
- Enforcing individual civil rights and not for the mere purpose of enforcing a penal law
The Correct Option is D
Solution and Explanation
Step 1: Understand the scope of specific relief.
- The Specific Relief Act focuses on the enforcement of civil rights, including contracts and property rights, but not for criminal law enforcement.
Top Questions on Contract Law
Match List-I with List-II\[\begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline \textbf{List-1} & \textbf{List-II} \\ \hline \text{(A) Hadley v. Baxendale} & \text{(1) Undue Influence} \\ \hline \text{(B) Henkel v. Pape} & \text{(II) Coercion} \\ \hline \text{(C) Manu Singh v. Umadat Pandey} & \text{(III) Quantum of Damages} \\ \hline \text{(D) Chikkam Amiraju v. Seshamma} & \text{(IV) Mistake} \\ \hline \end{array}\]
- CUET (PG) - 2025
- LLM
- Contract Law
- Which among the following are essential conditions under Section 10 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872? (A) Lawful Consideration
(B) Lawful Object
(C) Free Consent
(D) Intention Theory Choose the correct answer from the options given below:- CUET (PG) - 2025
- LLM
- Contract Law
- Which of the following is not included in the definition of 'business' under the Indian Partnership Act, 1932?
- CUET (PG) - 2025
- LLM
- Contract Law
- Which of the following case laws are associated with "Consideration" as per the Indian Contract Act, 1872? (A) Currie v. Misa
(B) Kedar Nath v. Gorie Mohammed
(C) Abdul Aziz v. Masum Ali
(D) Bhagwan Das Kedia v. Girdhari Lal Choose the correct answer from the options given below:- CUET (PG) - 2025
- LLM
- Contract Law
- Can the client's papers/documents under the possession of a lawyer be considered 'goods' to recover his fees, under the Sale of Goods Act, 1930?
- CUET (PG) - 2025
- LLM
- Contract Law
Questions Asked in CUET PG exam
Match List-I with List-II\[\begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline \textbf{Provision} & \textbf{Case Law} \\ \hline \text{(A) Strict Liability} & \text{(1) Ryland v. Fletcher} \\ \hline \text{(B) Absolute Liability} & \text{(II) M.C. Mehta v. Union of India} \\ \hline \text{(C) Negligence} & \text{(III) Nicholas v. Marsland} \\ \hline \text{(D) Act of God} & \text{(IV) MCD v. Subhagwanti} \\ \hline \end{array}\]
- CUET (PG) - 2025
- Law of Torts
Match List-I with List-II
\[\begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline \textbf{List-1} & \textbf{List-II} \\ \hline \text{(A) Complete Justice} & \text{(I) Article 137} \\ \hline \text{(B) Special Leave Petition} & \text{(II) Article 131} \\ \hline \text{(C) Review of the Judgments} & \text{(III) Article 142} \\ \hline \text{(D) Original Jurisdiction} & \text{(IV) Article 136} \\ \hline \end{array}\]
- CUET (PG) - 2025
- Judicial Process
Match List-I with List-II
- CUET (PG) - 2025
- Indian Constitution
Match List-I with List-II
\[\begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline \textbf{List-1} & \textbf{List-II} \\ \hline \text{(A) Ram Jawaya Kapur v. State of Punjab} & \text{(I) Separation of powers} \\ \hline \text{(B) Delhi Laws Act, 1912} & \text{(II) Delegated legislation} \\ \hline \text{(C) Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India} & \text{(III) Doctrine of proportionality} \\ \hline \text{(D) Om Kumar v. Union of India} & \text{(IV) Post decisional hearing} \\ \hline \end{array}\]
- CUET (PG) - 2025
- Administrative Law
Match List-I with List-II
- CUET (PG) - 2025
- Indian Constitution