| Patient | Vials | Patient | Vials |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | B,D,F,H | 9 | A,D,F,H |
| 2 | B,D,F,G | 10 | A,D,F,G |
| 3 | B,D,E,H | 11 | A,D,E,H |
| 4 | B,D,E,G | 12 | A,D,E,G |
| 5 | B,C,F,H | 13 | A,C,F,H |
| 6 | B,C,F,G | 14 | A,C,F,G |
| 7 | B,CE,H | 15 | A,C,E,H |
| 8 | B,C,E,G | 16 | A,C,E,G |
Vial C contains: \[ \{5, 6, 7, 8, 13, 14, 15, 16\} \] Since Vial C is positive, **at least one of these patients is infected**.
Now check which of these patients are also in Vials A, E, or H:
That eliminates: \[ \boxed{5, 7, 8, 13, 14, 15, 16} \] from suspicion because all are present in one or more negative vials.
The **only remaining patient in Vial C not appearing in any of the negative vials is**: \[ \boxed{6} \]
The diseased patient is: \[ \boxed{\text{Option (C): Patient 6}} \]
| Patient | Vials |
|---|---|
| 13 | A,C,F,H |
| 15 | A,C,E,H |
From the **negative vials D and G**, we eliminate the following patients:
From Vial D (negative): \(1, 2, 3, 4, 9, 10, 11, 12\) → Not diseased
From Vial G (negative): \(2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16\) → Also not diseased
Combining both, the only remaining candidates for infection are: \[ \boxed{13 \text{ and } 15} \] because they appear in Vial A (positive) but not in D or G.
Therefore:
The correct vial that will help determine the diseased patient is: \[ \boxed{\text{Option (A): Vial E}} \]
| Patient | Vials | Patient | Vials |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | B,D,F,H | 9 | A,D,F,H |
| 2 | B,D,F,G | 10 | A,D,F,G |
| 3 | B,D,E,H | 11 | A,D,E,H |
| 4 | B,D,E,G | 12 | A,D,E,G |
| 5 | B,C,F,H | 13 | A,C,F,H |
| 6 | B,C,F,G | 14 | A,C,F,G |
| 7 | B,C,E,H | 15 | A,C,E,H |
| 8 | B,C,E,G | 16 | A,C,E,G |
If vials C and D are negative, then the patients contained in them can be confirmed as disease-free.
From the vial compositions:
Together, vials C and D cover **all 16 patients**. Hence: \[ \text{If both C and D are negative} \Rightarrow \text{no patient has the disease} \] Which contradicts the assumption that at least one patient is infected.
Therefore, **both vials C and D cannot be negative together unless no one is infected**, which is not the case.
This combination is consistent with at least one patient having the disease and is logically possible.
The correct option is (D): \[ \boxed{\text{Vials A and E positive, vials C and D negative}} \]
| Patient | Vials | Patient | Vials |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | B,D,F,H | 9 | A,D,F,H |
| 2 | B,D,F,G | 10 | A,D,F,G |
| 3 | B,D,E,H | 11 | A,D,E,H |
| 4 | B,D,E,G | 12 | A,D,E,G |
| 5 | B,C,F,H | 13 | A,C,F,H |
| 6 | B,C,F,G | 14 | A,C,F,G |
| 7 | B,CE,H | 15 | A,C,E,H |
| 8 | B,C,E,G | 16 | A,C,E,G |
Consider a scenario where patients' blood samples are pooled and distributed across 8 vials, each containing a subset of patients. A vial tests positive if at least one diseased patient's blood is included in it.
Depending on how the infected blood is distributed among the vials, the number of positive tests can be: \[ \boxed{4, 5, 6, 7, \text{or } 8} \]
The correct option is (C): \[ \boxed{\{4, 5, 6, 7, 8\}} \]
Funky Pizzeria was required to supply Pizzas to three different parties. The total number of pizzas it had to deliver was 800, 70% of which was to be delivered to Party 3 and the rest equally divided between Party 1 and Party 2. Pizzas could be of Thin Crust (T) or Deep Dish (D) variety and come in either Normal Cheese (NC) or Extra Cheese (EC) versions. Hence, there are 4 types of pizzas: T-NC, T-EC, D-NC, D-EC. Partial information about proportions of T and NC pizzas ordered by the three parties are given below.





The average of three distinct real numbers is 28. If the smallest number is increased by 7 and the largest number is reduced by 10, the order of the numbers remains unchanged, and the new arithmetic mean becomes 2 more than the middle number, while the difference between the largest and the smallest numbers becomes 64.Then, the largest number in the original set of three numbers is