Question:

Should Judicial Activism be discouraged?
Arguments:
I. No, it would lead to executive dictatorship.
II. Yes, Judiciary should stay in the \dots

Show Hint

A strong argument should be clear, specific, and logically connected to the question—mere assertions without reasoning are weak.
Updated On: Aug 11, 2025
  • Argument I is strong
  • Argument II is strong
  • Both the arguments are strong
  • Both the arguments are weak
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is D

Solution and Explanation

Argument I is weak because it merely states a fear (“executive dictatorship”) without reasoning or evidence linking it to discouraging judicial activism.
Argument II is incomplete and vague (“should stay in the…” is unclear) and thus cannot be considered strong.
Both fail the test of being specific, fact-based, and relevantly reasoned.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0

Top Questions on Statements and Arguments

View More Questions

Questions Asked in CLAT exam

View More Questions