Let's denote the initial investment amount by Jack and Sristi as Rs. P.
1. For Jack, his investment reduces by 50% each month. Thus:
- After 1st month: \( P \times \frac{1}{2} \)
- After 2nd month: \( P \times \left(\frac{1}{2}\right)^2 \)
- After 3rd month: \( P \times \left(\frac{1}{2}\right)^3 \)
- After 4th month: \( P \times \left(\frac{1}{2}\right)^4 \)
- After 5th month: \( P \times \left(\frac{1}{2}\right)^5 \)
- After 6th month: \( P \times \left(\frac{1}{2}\right)^6 \)
2. For Sristi, her investment follows an arithmetic progression (AP) with a common difference of Rs. 15000. Thus:
- After 1st month: \( P - 15000 \)
- After 2nd month: \( P - 2 \times 15000 \)
- After 3rd month: \( P - 3 \times 15000 \)
- After 4th month: \( P - 4 \times 15000 \)
- After 5th month: \( P - 5 \times 15000 \)
- After 6th month: \( P - 6 \times 15000 \)
3. The problem states that the ratio of their remaining amounts after the 4th and 6th months are the same.
Thus:
\[\frac{P \times \left(\frac{1}{2}\right)^4}{P - 4 \times 15000} = \frac{P \times \left(\frac{1}{2}\right)^6}{P - 6 \times 15000}\]
Simplifying, we get:
\[\frac{\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)^4}{P - 60000} = \frac{\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)^6}{P - 90000}\]
\[\frac{16}{P - 60000} = \frac{4}{P - 90000}\]
Cross multiply:
\[16(P - 90000) = 4(P - 60000)\]
Simplifying:
\[16P - 1440000 = 4P - 240000\]
\[12P = 1200000\]
\[P = 100000\]
The amount of money invested by Jack in the stock market was Rs. 100000.
Health insurance plays a vital role in ensuring financial protection and access to quality healthcare. In India, however, the extent and nature of health insurance coverage vary significantly between urban and rural areas. While urban populations often have better access to organized insurance schemes, employer-provided coverage, and awareness about health policies, rural populations face challenges such as limited outreach of insurance schemes, inadequate infrastructure, and lower awareness levels. This urban-rural divide in health insurance coverage highlights the broader issue of healthcare inequality, making it essential to analyze the factors contributing to this gap and explore strategies for more inclusive health protection. A state-level health survey was conducted.
The survey covered 1,80,000 adults across urban and rural areas. Urban residents formed 55% of the sample (that is, 99,000 people) while rural residents made up 45% (that is, 81,000 people). In each area, coverage was classified under four heads – Public schemes, Private insurance, Employer-provided coverage, and Uninsured. In urban areas, Public coverage accounted for 28% of the urban population, Private for 22%, Employer for 18%, and the remaining 32% were Uninsured. In rural areas, where formal coverage is generally lower, Public coverage stood at 35%, Private at 10%, Employer at 8%, while 47% were Uninsured.
For this survey, “Insured” includes everyone covered by Public + Private + Employer schemes, and “Uninsured” indicates those with no coverage at all. Officials noted that public schemes remain the backbone of rural coverage, while employer and private plans are relatively more prevalent in urban centres. (250 words)