Comprehension

Read the passage carefully and choose the best answer for each question.

How quickly things change in the technology business! A decade ago, IBM was the awesome and undisputed king of the computer trade, universally feared and respected. A decade ago, two little companies called Intel and Microsoft were mere blips on the radar screen of the industry, upstart start-ups that had signed on to make the chips and software for IBM’s new line of personal computers. Though their products soon became industry standards, the two companies remained protected children of the market leader.

What happened since is a startling reversal of fortune. IBM is being ravaged by the worst crisis in the company’s 79 year history. It is undergoing its fifth restructuring in the past seven years as well as seemingly endless rounds of job cuts and firings that have eliminated 100,000 jobs since 1985. Last week IBM announced to its shell-shocked investors that it lost \$4.97 billion last year – the biggest loss in American corporate history.

And just when IBM is losing ground in one market after another, Intel and Microsoft have emerged as the computer industry’s most fearsome pair of competitors. The numbers on Wall Street tell a stunning story. Ten years ago, the market value of the stock of Intel and Microsoft combined amounted to about a tenth of IBM’s. Last week, with IBM’s stock at an 11-year low, Microsoft’s value surpassed its old mentor’s for the first time ever (\$26.76 billion to \$26.48 billion) and Intel (\$24.3 billion) is not far behind. While IBM is posting losses, Intel’s profits jumped 30% and Microsoft’s rose 44%.


Both Intel, the world’s largest supplier of computer chips, and Microsoft, the world’s largest supplier of computer software, have assumed the role long played by Big Blue as the industry’s pacesetter. What is taking place is a generational shift unprecedented in the information age – one recalls a transition in the US auto industry 70 years ago, when Alfred Sloan’s upstart General Motors surpassed Ford Motor as America’s No. 1 car maker. The transition also reflects the decline of computer manufacturers such as IBM, Wang, and Unisys and the rise of companies like Microsoft, Intel, and AT\&T that create the chips and software to make the computers work. “Just like Dr. Frankenstein, IBM created these two monster competitors,” says Richard Shaffer, publisher of the Computer Letter. “Now even IBM is in danger of being trampled by the creations it unleashed.”


Although Intel and Microsoft still have close relationships with Big Blue, there is little love lost between IBM and its potent progeny. IBM had an ugly falling-out with former partner Microsoft over the future of personal computer software. Microsoft developed the now famous disk operating system for IBM-PC – called DOS – and later created the operating software for the next generation of IBM personal computers, the Personal System/2. When PS/2 and its operating system, OS/2, failed to catch on, a feud erupted over how the two companies would upgrade the system. Although they publicly patched things up, the partnership was tattered. IBM developed its own version of OS/2, which has so far failed to capture the industry’s imagination. Microsoft’s competing version, dubbed New Technology, or NT, will debut in a few months and will incorporate Microsoft’s highly successful Windows program, which lets users juggle several programs at once. Windows NT, however, will offer more new features, such as the ability to link many computers together in a network and to safeguard them against unauthorized use.

IBM and Intel have also been parting company. After relying almost exclusively on the Santa Clara, California company for the silicon chips that serve as computer brains, IBM has moved to reduce its dependence on Intel by turning to competing vendors. In Europe, IBM last year began selling a low-cost line of PCs called Ambra, which runs on chips made by Intel rival Advanced Micro Devices. IBM also demonstrated a sample PC using a chip made by another Intel enemy, Cyrix. And that October IBM said it would begin selling the company’s own chips to outsiders in direct competition with Intel.

IBM clearly feels threatened. And the wounded giant still poses the biggest threat to any further dominance by Intel and Microsoft. Last year, it teamed up with both companies' most bitter rivals – Apple Computers and Motorola – to develop advanced software and microprocessors for a new generation of desktop computers. In selecting Apple and Motorola, IBM bypassed its longtime partners. Just as Microsoft’s standard operating system runs only on computers built around Intel’s computer chips, Apple’s software runs only on Motorola’s chips. Although IBM has pledged that the new system will eventually run on a variety of machines, it will initially run only computer programs written for Apple’s Macintosh or IBM’s OS/2. Its competitive juice now flowing, IBM last week announced that it and Apple Computer will deliver the operating system in 1994 – a year ahead of schedule.

Question: 1

As a result of greater competition in the US Computer industry

Show Hint

When asked about implications of competition, look for uneven growth or decline among players—not just overall trends.
Updated On: Aug 6, 2025
  • some computer companies are expanding while others are contracting.
  • employment in the industry is going down.
  • the industry is becoming more monopolized.
  • the share value of IBM is going up relative to that of Intel and Microsoft.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is A

Solution and Explanation

The passage discusses how increased competition in the computer industry is causing a divergence—some companies are growing while others are shrinking. The example of Intel and Microsoft gaining value and IBM laying off employees clearly supports this dynamic. Hence, option (a) is accurate. Other options either lack textual support (b and d) or contradict the idea of competition (c suggests monopolization, which is the opposite of increased competition).
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 2

Which of the following statements is not implied by the passage?

Show Hint

"Not implied" means it’s not even suggested subtly—watch for exaggerations or factual claims beyond what’s in the passage.
Updated On: Aug 6, 2025
  • The market of microchips and software’s are becoming leaders in the computer industry.
  • Wang and Unisys are primarily manufacturers of computers.
  • IBM laying off workers in the biggest job cut in American corporate history.
  • Intel is based in California.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is C

Solution and Explanation

The passage mentions IBM's job cuts but never labels them as "the biggest job cut in American corporate history." That exaggeration makes option (c) not implied. All other options are directly or indirectly supported by the passage. Option (a) is backed by Intel and Microsoft rising in the industry, (b) by their categorization, and (d) is stated outright.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 3

The personal computer called Ambra is marketed by:

Show Hint

Scan passages for proper nouns and product relationships—many factual RC questions test name associations.
Updated On: Aug 6, 2025
  • Cyrix.
  • IBM.
  • Intel.
  • Microsoft.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is B

Solution and Explanation

The passage directly states that IBM markets a personal computer brand named Ambra. This is a fact-based question that checks memory and attention to detail. None of the other companies are linked to Ambra in the passage.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 4

Why is something that happened 70 years ago in the US auto industry being mentioned here?

Show Hint

Understand the structure of analogies—they often map historical context to current trends to illustrate patterns or transformations.
Updated On: Aug 6, 2025
  • General Motors broke away from Ford Motors.
  • A new company went ahead of an established market leader.
  • Like Dr. Frankenstein, Ford Motor created a monster in General Motors.
  • Microsoft, Intel and AT \& T were originally created by IBM.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is B

Solution and Explanation

The analogy from the auto industry illustrates how newer companies can surpass older, established giants—just as Intel and Microsoft overtook IBM. Option (b) captures this parallel. The others either make unrelated claims (a, d) or metaphorical references (c) that aren’t central to the analogy.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 5

Who is mentioned as the principal supplier of silicon chips to IBM?

Show Hint

For factual questions, look for exact names or terms mentioned in the passage to avoid inference errors.
Updated On: Aug 6, 2025
  • AT\&T.
  • Microsoft.
  • Cyrix.
  • Intel.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is D

Solution and Explanation

The passage explicitly mentions that Intel is the main supplier of silicon chips to IBM. No other company listed in the options is stated in this role. Therefore, option (d) is correct. This is a factual recall question based on a direct statement in the text.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 6

One possible conclusion from the passage is that

Show Hint

Conclusion questions often ask for the overall impact or main idea. Look at what the author emphasizes in the final parts of the passage.
Updated On: Aug 6, 2025
  • share prices are not a good indicator of a company’s performance.
  • firing workers restores a company’s health.
  • all companies ultimately regret being a Dr. Frankenstein to some other company.
  • consumers gain as a result of competition among producers.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is D

Solution and Explanation

The passage discusses how intense competition in the computer industry results in both expansion and contraction among firms, and highlights that this dynamic benefits consumers. This suggests that the key takeaway is how competition leads to consumer advantage — making option (d) the most logical conclusion from the passage.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 7

Which of the following statements is true?

Show Hint

Always look for options supported directly by the passage — do not infer beyond the scope of what's stated.
Updated On: Aug 6, 2025
  • IBM plans to introduce a new system that will run on a variety of machines.
  • IBM’s new generation desk top computers will run only on Motorola’s chips.
  • IBM is working out a joint strategy with Apple to force Motorola to supply chips at a lower price.
  • IBM is going to sell its own chips to Apple and Motorola.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is A

Solution and Explanation

According to the information in the passage, IBM was planning to develop a new system that would be more versatile and capable of running on a wide range of machines. This would be a shift from the then-current trend of systems locked into specific hardware environments. Among the options given, only (a) talks about such a general-purpose, wide-compatibility system. The other options are either not supported by the passage or refer to other companies’ actions.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 8

Many computers will be linked together through a network in a system developed by

Show Hint

When multiple companies are mentioned, match exact phrases from the passage to the answer choice to avoid confusion.
Updated On: Aug 6, 2025
  • IBM.
  • Apple.
  • Microsoft.
  • None of the above.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is C

Solution and Explanation

The passage clearly mentions that Microsoft was developing a system for networking computers together. This initiative reflected Microsoft's broader strategy to expand its role beyond just operating systems and into enterprise-level systems. While IBM and Apple are prominent tech companies, the passage credits Microsoft specifically with this networking initiative.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 9

What was the original reason for the feud between IBM and Microsoft?

Show Hint

Focus on the origin of rivalry in competitive industries — it's often tied to overlapping markets or product lines.
Updated On: Aug 6, 2025
  • The two companies developed competing software’s.
  • Microsoft and Intel teamed up against IBM.
  • IBM began to purchase microchips from Intel instead of Microsoft.
  • IBM made loses while Microsoft made profits.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is A

Solution and Explanation

The root of the feud between IBM and Microsoft was the fact that they began to compete in the software space. Microsoft, originally a supplier to IBM, developed operating systems that became independent and widely adopted. This strategic move positioned Microsoft as a direct competitor to IBM, sparking conflict between the two. None of the other options address the core strategic rivalry described.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 10

Which of the following statements is true?

Show Hint

When asked to identify a true statement, always choose the one best supported by specific phrasing in the passage rather than plausible-sounding assumptions.
Updated On: Aug 6, 2025
  • IBM plans to introduce a new system that will run on a variety of machines.
  • IBM’s new generation desk top computers will run only on Motorola’s chips.
  • IBM is working out a joint strategy with Apple to force Motorola to supply chips at a lower price.
  • IBM is going to sell its own chips to Apple and Motorola.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is A

Solution and Explanation

This question asks which statement is directly supported by the passage. The relevant part of the passage discusses IBM’s shift in strategy, highlighting that IBM plans to introduce a system that is compatible with various machines rather than locking users into a specific ecosystem. Option (a) correctly reflects this development and strategy by IBM, aligning with the broader goal of maintaining competitiveness in a dynamic market.
Option (b) is inaccurate because IBM would not restrict its new systems to a single chip manufacturer, especially given the context of competition and flexibility.
Option (c) refers to a joint strategy but lacks direct support from the passage.
Option (d) is speculative — the passage never states IBM intends to sell chips to others.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 11

Many computers will be linked together through a network in a system developed by

Show Hint

Match exact roles or innovations to companies mentioned in the passage — network systems were attributed to Microsoft, not IBM or Apple.
Updated On: Aug 6, 2025
  • IBM.
  • Apple.
  • Microsoft.
  • None of the above.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is C

Solution and Explanation

The passage clearly points out that Microsoft was leading the effort in developing a system where multiple computers could be linked together in a network. This aligns with Microsoft’s historical role in networked computing and server-client models that later became standard in office and enterprise environments.
IBM, though a major player in hardware, was not the company developing this network system as per the passage. Apple is not even mentioned in that context, and hence is irrelevant here.
Thus, Microsoft is the correct choice based on direct evidence from the text.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 12

What was the original reason for the feud between IBM and Microsoft?

Show Hint

Focus on the chronological cause of conflict when identifying the origin of a rivalry — competition in product offerings is often the first trigger.
Updated On: Aug 6, 2025
  • The two companies developed competing software’s.
  • Microsoft and Intel teamed up against IBM.
  • IBM began to purchase microchips from Intel instead of Microsoft.
  • IBM made losses while Microsoft made profits.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is A

Solution and Explanation

The feud between IBM and Microsoft originated when Microsoft shifted from being merely a software provider for IBM to a direct competitor. The passage mentions that the two companies started developing competing software, signaling a conflict of interest and a breakdown in their earlier partnership. This competition in the software market marked the root cause of the fallout between the two tech giants.
Option (b) is misleading — while alliances matter, the main issue was competitive software.
Option (c) mixes up hardware-supplier relations and is not related to the feud.
Option (d) states a consequence (profit difference), not the cause.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0

Top Questions on Reading Comprehension

View More Questions