Comprehension
Read the given passage carefully and answer file questions that follow.
There is a fairly universal sentiment that the use of nuclear weapons is clearly contrary to morality and that its production probably so, dues not go far enough. These activities are not only opposed to morality but also to law if the legal objection can be added to the moral, the argument against the use and the manufacture of these weapons will considerably be reinforced. Now the time is ripe to evaluate the responsibility of scientists who knowingly use their expertise for the construction of such weapons, which has deleterious effect on mankind.
To this must be added the fact that more than 50 percent of the skilled scientific manpower in the world is now engaged in the armaments industry. How appropriate it is that all this valuable skill should be devoted to the manufacture of weapons of death in a world of poverty is a question that must touch the scientific conscience.
A meeting of biologists on the Long Term Worldwide Biological consequences of nuclear war added frightening dimension to those forecasts. Its report suggested that the long biological effects resulting from climatic changes may at least be as serious as the immediate ones. Sub freezing temperatures, low light levels, and high doses of ionizing and ultraviolet radiation extending for many months after a large scale nuclear war could destroy the biological support system of civilization, at least in the Northern hemisphere. Productivity in natural and agricultural ecosystem could be severely restricted for a year or more.
Post war survivors would face starvation as well as freezing conditions in the dark and be exposed to near lethal doses of radiation. If, as now seems possible, the, Southern Hemisphere were affected also, global disruption of the biosphere could ensue. In any event, there would be severe consequences, even in the areas not affected directly, because of the inter dependence of the world economy. In either case the extinction of a large fraction of the earth's animals, plants and microorganism seems possible. The population size of Homo sapiens conceivably could be reduced to prehistoric levels or below, and extinction of human species itself cannot be excluded.
Question: 1

Choose the word which is most opposite in meaning of the word, printed in bold as used in the passage Deleterious.

Show Hint

When asked for an antonym, first substitute the bold word with a simple synonym from the sentence and then pick the option that conveys the opposite of that synonym.
Updated On: Aug 12, 2025
  • Beneficial
  • harmful
  • Irreparable
  • Non cognizable
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is A

Solution and Explanation

The word "deleterious" in the passage describes the harmful effect of weapons on mankind.
Among the options, "harmful" is a synonym, not an opposite. "Irreparable" and "non cognizable" do not directly oppose the sense.
"Beneficial" is the direct opposite of "deleterious".
Hence the correct option is (a) Beneficial.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 2

The author's most important objective of writing the above passage seems to………….

Show Hint

Look for the writer's main thrust across the whole passage (opening + supporting paragraphs) rather than a single paragraph when choosing author's intent.
Updated On: Aug 12, 2025
  • Highlight the use of nuclear weapons as a collective population control measures
  • Illustrate the devastating effects of use of nuclear weapons on mankind.
  • Duly highlight the supremacy of the nations which possess nuclear weapons.
  • Summarise the long biological effects of use of nuclear weapons.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is B

Solution and Explanation

Read the passage's central theme — it repeatedly emphasises moral, legal and especially biological/ecological consequences of nuclear weapons.
Options (d) and (b) are close: (d) is narrower (summarise long biological effects) while (b) captures the broader intent — to illustrate devastating effects on mankind (moral, legal, biological, societal).
The passage opens with moral/legal objections, then details biological/ecosystem impacts and societal consequences — confirming the author's aim to highlight devastation.
Hence the best choice is (b).
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 3

The scientists engaged in manufacturing destructive weapons are ……………….

Show Hint

When a factual detail is asked, scan for exact figures or clear statements in the passage — the correct option usually mirrors the sentence closely.
Updated On: Aug 12, 2025
  • Very few in number
  • Irresponsible and incompetent
  • More than half of the total number
  • Engaged in the armaments industry against their desire
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is C

Solution and Explanation

The passage explicitly states that "more than 50 percent of the skilled scientific manpower in the world is now engaged in the armaments industry."
This maps directly to option (c). Other options contradict or are not supported by the passage.
Hence the correct answer is (c).
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 4

According to the passage, the argument on use and manufacture of nuclear weapons

Show Hint

Pick the option that most closely paraphrases a clear line from the passage when the question is about the author's assertion.
Updated On: Aug 12, 2025
  • Does not stand the test of legality
  • Possesses legal strength although it does not have moral standing
  • Is acceptable only on moral grounds
  • Becomes stronger if legal and moral considerations are combined
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is D

Solution and Explanation

The passage says that these activities are opposed to morality and also to law — and that "if the legal objection can be added to the moral, the argument against the use and the manufacture of these weapons will considerably be reinforced."
That sentence directly supports (d): combining legal and moral objections makes the argument stronger.
Hence the correct answer is (d).
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 5

The author of the passage seems to be of the view that

Show Hint

For attitude/stance questions, summarise the passage's tone (critical/supportive/neutral) then choose the option matching that tone.
Updated On: Aug 12, 2025
  • Utilization of scientific skills in manufacture of weapons is appropriate
  • Manufacture of weapons of death would help eradication of poverty
  • Spending money on manufacture of weapons may be justifiable subject to the availability of funds
  • Utilization of valuable knowledge for manufacture of lethal weapons is inhuman
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is D

Solution and Explanation

The passage repeatedly condemns diverting scientific skill to armaments and calls the effects "deleterious" and "lethal", raising moral concerns about such use of knowledge.
Options (a), (b), (c) support or justify weapon manufacture — contrary to the passage's critical stance. Option (d) captures the author's moral rejection that using valuable knowledge to make lethal weapons is inhumane.
Hence the correct choice is (d).
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 6

Which of the following is one of the consequences of nuclear war?

Show Hint

Match time-frames and keywords: when the passage mentions "for a year or more" or similar phrases, prefer the option that echoes that timeframe even if the option's wording is slightly awkward.
Updated On: Aug 12, 2025
  • Fertility of land will last for a year or so.
  • Post war survivors being very few will have abundant food.
  • Lights would be cooler and more comfortable.
  • Southern Hemisphere would remain quite safe in the post war period.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is A

Solution and Explanation

Locate the relevant sentence: the passage says "Productivity in natural and agricultural ecosystem could be severely restricted for a year or more."
That line indicates agricultural fertility/productivity would be affected for about a year or more after a large-scale nuclear war.
Option (a) is the only choice that refers to a one-year timescale for land/agricultural condition and therefore (despite brief awkward wording) is the statement linked to the passage's claim about the duration of post-war agricultural impact.
Step 4: Options (b) and (c) directly contradict the passage (the passage predicts starvation and low light levels, not abundant food or "cool comfortable" lights) and (d) is contradicted by the line saying the Southern Hemisphere might also be affected.
Hence the most appropriate choice is (a).
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 7

Which of the following best explains the word \(\textit{devoted}\), as used in the passage?
 

Show Hint

Always read the immediate context around the target word — positive/negative tone in the sentence will usually tell you which meaning is intended.
Updated On: Aug 12, 2025
  • Dedicated for a good cause
  • Utilized for betterment
  • Abused for destruction
  • Underutilized
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is C

Solution and Explanation

Examine the sentence: "How appropriate it is that all this valuable skill should be devoted to the manufacture of weapons of death..." — here "devoted to" describes allocation of valuable skill toward weapon production.
The context is critical/negative: skills are being put to harmful ends (manufacture of "weapons of death"), so the sense is that they are being misapplied or abused for destruction.
Option (c) "Abused for destruction" best fits this negative sense. Options (a) and (b) are positive senses (dedicated/for betterment) and (d) "Underutilized" does not capture the sense of being put to harmful use.
Hence the correct choice is (c).
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 8

The biological consequences of nuclear war as given in the passage include all the following, except

Show Hint

For 'except' questions, first mark all items explicitly mentioned in the passage — the remaining option is the correct choice.
Updated On: Aug 12, 2025
  • Fall in temperature below zero degree Celsius
  • Ultraviolet radiation
  • High doses of ionizing
  • Abundant food for smaller population
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is D

Solution and Explanation

The passage lists specific biological consequences: "Sub freezing temperatures, low light levels, and high doses of ionizing and ultraviolet radiation extending for many months..." — this supports (a), (b) and (c).
The passage further predicts "Post war survivors would face starvation..." which contradicts the idea of abundant food.
Therefore the statement that biological consequences include "abundant food for smaller population" is not given by the passage and is the exception.
Hence the correct answer is (d).
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 9

It appears from the passage that the use of nuclear weapons is considered against morality by

Show Hint

Words like "universal", "widely", "generally" in the passage point to answers that indicate majority or near-global views.
Updated On: Aug 12, 2025
  • Only such of those nations who cannot afford to manufacture and sell weapons
  • Almost all the nations of the word
  • Only the superpowers who can afford to manufacture and sell weapons
  • Most of the scientists devote their valuable skills to manufacture nuclear weapons.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is B

Solution and Explanation

The passage begins with: "There is a fairly universal sentiment that the use of nuclear weapons is clearly contrary to morality..." — "fairly universal" indicates a widespread (nearly global) moral objection.
Option (b) paraphrases this idea ("Almost all the nations of the world") and therefore best matches the passage.
Options (a) and (c) restrict the view to certain nations (not supported by "universal"), and (d) is a factual statement about scientists, not about who considers the weapons immoral.
Hence the correct answer is (b).
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 10

Which of the following statements I, II, III and IV is definitely true in the context of the passage?
(I) There is every likelihood of survival of the human species as a consequence of nuclear war.
(II) Nuclear war risks and harmful effects are highly exaggerated.
(III) The post war survivors would be exposed to the benefits of non lethal radiation.
(IV) Living organisms in the areas which were not directly affected by nuclear war would also suffer.

Show Hint

For multi-statement items, check each statement against explicit lines in the passage — mark true/false and pick the option containing the definitely true statement(s).
Updated On: Aug 12, 2025
  • I
  • III
  • II
  • IV
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is D

Solution and Explanation

Check statement (I) — the passage warns extinction is possible and that human population "could be reduced to prehistoric levels or below, and extinction of human species itself cannot be excluded." So (I) is false.
Check (II) — the passage treats risks and harmful effects seriously (not as exaggerated), so (II) is false.
Check (III) — the passage says survivors "would face starvation ... and be exposed to near lethal doses of radiation" — not benefits of non-lethal radiation; (III) is false.
Step 4: Check (IV) — the passage explicitly says there "would be severe consequences, even in the areas not affected directly, because of the inter dependence of the world economy," so living organisms in indirectly affected areas would also suffer — (IV) is true.
Hence the only definitely true statement is (IV), so select (d).
Was this answer helpful?
0
0

Top Questions on Reading Comprehension

View More Questions

Questions Asked in CLAT exam

View More Questions