Question:

Principle : Intentional application of force to another person is action able in law.
Facts : 'P' and 'D' are unknown to each other. When 'P' is about to sit on a chair, 'D' intentionally pulls it away as a result of which 'P' falls on the floor and is injured.

Show Hint

Injury caused by intentional actions makes the person responsible, irrespective of the severity.
Updated On: Aug 18, 2025
  • 'D' is not liable as 'P' is not seriously injured.
  • 'D' is liable as he intentionally caused injury to P.
  • 'D' is not liable as such jokes are common in the society.
  • 'D' is not liable as the injury is not directly caused.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is B

Solution and Explanation

The principle clearly states that the intentional application of force leading to injury constitutes an actionable offence. Here, 'D' intentionally pulled the chair and caused 'P' to fall and get injured. Therefore, 'D' is liable for causing injury to 'P'.


Option (A) 'D' is not liable as 'P' is not seriously injured: This is incorrect. Liability arises from intentional action, not the severity of the injury.

Option (C) 'D' is not liable as such jokes are common in society: Even though it might be a common prank, it still constitutes an intentional act that caused injury, making 'D' liable.

Option (D) 'D' is not liable as the injury is not directly caused: This is incorrect. The injury is directly caused by 'D's action of pulling the chair.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0

Top Questions on Law of Torts

View More Questions

Questions Asked in CLAT exam

View More Questions