Comprehension
’Poverty is-more restrictive and limiting than anything else. If poverty and low standards continue then democracy, for all its fine institutions and ideals, ceases to be a liberating force. It must therefore aim continuously at the eradication of poverty and its companion unemployment. In other words, political democracy is not enough. It must develop into economic democracy also’.
Question: 1

Which of the following is not implied by the above passage?

Show Hint

Look for overstatements. The passage implies something may happen under a condition, but not necessarily that it has already happened.
Updated On: Aug 11, 2025
  • Democracy has ceased to be a liberating force.
  • Democracy should aim to eliminate poverty.
  • Poverty and unemployment go hand in hand.
  • Political democracy should develop into economic democracy.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is A

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: Understand the key idea of the passage
- The passage argues that poverty restricts liberty more than anything else.
- Democracy, despite its ideals, can cease to be a liberating force if poverty persists.
- Thus, political democracy must evolve into economic democracy to truly liberate people. Step 2: Analyze what is implied and what is not - (a) Democracy has ceased to be a liberating force.} — This is too strong. The passage says democracy “ceases to be” a liberating force **if** poverty continues, i.e., it's conditional. It doesn't claim that it already has. So, this is not implied. ✗ - (b) Democracy should aim to eliminate poverty.} — Directly stated: "must aim continuously at the eradication of poverty". \checkmark - (c) Poverty and unemployment go hand in hand.} — Mentioned in "its companion unemployment". \checkmark - (d) Political democracy should develop into economic democracy.} — Stated word-for-word. \checkmark % Final Answer \[ \boxed{\text{(a)}} \]
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 2

Which of the following views, if true, would weaken the argument of the above passage?

Show Hint

When weakening an argument, always challenge the key assumption or core belief of the passage directly.
Updated On: Aug 11, 2025
  • Political democracy is inseparable from economic democracy.
  • Poverty does not in fact restrict freedom.
  • Democracy flourishes most in poor societies.
  • Economic democracy is a necessary condition for the elimination of unemployment.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is B

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: Identify the main argument The passage states: - Poverty restricts liberty more than anything.
- If poverty continues, democracy becomes meaningless.
- Therefore, economic democracy is essential. Step 2: Find which view weakens this argument - (a) Political democracy is inseparable from economic democracy.} — Supports the argument. - (b) Poverty does not restrict freedom.} — Contradicts the very foundation of the argument. If poverty doesn’t affect liberty, the whole premise falls. - (c) Democracy flourishes most in poor societies.} — Weakens it slightly, but it doesn’t address the freedom or economic democracy angle directly. Weaker than (b). - (d) Economic democracy is needed to eliminate unemployment.} — This supports the passage argument. % Final Answer \[ \boxed{\text{(b)}} \]
Was this answer helpful?
0
0

Top Questions on Reading Comprehension

View More Questions

Questions Asked in CLAT exam

View More Questions