Question

People arguing for a position have been known to cast the opposite in an unnecessarily feeble light. (\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_). People who indulge in this fallacy may be fearful or ignorant of a strong counter argument. Detecting this fallacy often depends on having already heard a better refutation, or having information with which to construct one.

• A. Casting the opposite as weaker than it really is, is a very effective strategy.
• B. This portrayal of a refutation as weaker than it really is, is a sure way of proving your point.
• C. Casting the opposite as weaker than it really is, is not a very effective strategy.
• D. This portrayal of refutation as weaker than it really is, is unwarranted.

Hint:

Be alert to the tone of the paragraph—words like "fallacy" and "ignorant" suggest a negative critique, not endorsement.

Answer 1

The Correct Option is C

The key idea in the passage is the logical fallacy of misrepresenting the opposing view as weaker.
Option (c) fits best logically—it recognizes the fallacy but notes its ineffectiveness, aligning with the idea that people who indulge in this tactic may not be aware of better counterarguments.
Other options either praise or justify the fallacy, which would contradict the warning tone of the paragraph.