Step 1: Determine R and S.
- The average of R and S is 63. So \( \frac{R+S}{2} = 63 \Rightarrow R+S = 126 \).
- The difference between R and S is 2. So \( R-S = 2 \) (assuming \(R > S\)).
- Solving these two equations: \( 2R = 128 \Rightarrow R = 64 \). Then \( S = 62 \). So, two of the numbers are 62 and 64.
Step 2: Determine the set of five consecutive integers.
- Since 62 and 64 are part of a set of five consecutive integers, the set must be one of these: {60,61,62,63,64}, {61,62,63,64,65}, {62,63,64,65,66}.
- The problem states the smallest is \(> 60\). This eliminates the first set.
- The greatest is \(< 70\). This condition is met by both remaining sets.
Step 3: Use the remaining clues to identify the correct set and assign numbers.
- (iii) "Both the digits of P are same". In the range 61–66, the only number with identical digits is 66. So \(P=66\). This means the set must be {62, 63, 64, 65, 66}.
- (ii) "T is a multiple of 9". In this set, the only multiple of 9 is 63. So \(T=63\).
- We have \(P=66, T=63, R=64, S=62\).
- The remaining number in the set is 65, so \(Q=65\).
- (i) "A and B both are prime numbers". This seems to be a typo and should refer to two of the numbers P,Q,R,S,T. Let's check the primality of our numbers. None of 62, 63, 64, 65, 66 are prime. This indicates a contradiction in the problem statement.
Let's reconsider the set {61,62,63,64,65}.
- \(P=66\) is not in this set. This set is not possible.
Let's re-read clue (i). "A and B both are prime numbers." This is likely a typo for two of P,Q,R,S,T. If no numbers in the set are prime, the question is flawed.
Let's check the primes between 60 and 70. They are 61 and 67.
If the set contains two primes, it must contain 61 and 67. The only set of 5 consecutive integers that could contain one of them is {61,62,63,64,65}. It doesn't contain 67. A set of 5 cannot contain both.
This is a major contradiction. Let's ignore clue (i) and see if we can proceed.
Let's assume the set is {62, 63, 64, 65, 66}.
\(P=66, T=63, R=64, S=62, Q=65\).
Step 4: Find the sum of the digits of Q.
\[ Q = 65 \quad \Rightarrow \quad 6+5 = 11 \]
\[ \boxed{11} \]
Match the LIST-I (Spectroscopy) with LIST-II (Application)
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Visible light spectroscopy | III. Identification on the basis of color |
B. Fluorescence spectroscopy | IV. Identification on the basis of fluorophore present |
C. FTIR spectroscopy | I. Identification on the basis of absorption in infrared region |
D. Mass Spectroscopy | II. Identification on the basis of m/z ion |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Forensic Psychiatry | III. Behavioural pattern of criminal |
B. Forensic Engineering | IV. Origin of metallic fracture |
C. Forensic Odontology | I. Bite marks analysis |
D. Computer Forensics | II. Information derived from digital devices |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Calvin Goddard | II. Forensic Ballistics |
B. Karl Landsteiner | III. Blood Grouping |
C. Albert Osborn | IV. Document examination |
D. Mathieu Orfila | I. Forensic Toxicology |
Match the LIST-I (Evidence, etc.) with LIST-II (Example, Construction etc.)
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Biological evidence | IV. Blood |
B. Latent print evidence | III. Fingerprints |
C. Trace evidence | II. Soil |
D. Digital evidence | I. Cell phone records |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Ridges | III. The raised portion of the friction skin of the fingers |
B. Type Lines | I. Two most inner ridges which start parallel, diverge and surround or tend to surround the pattern area |
C. Delta | IV. The ridge characteristics nearest to the point of divergence of type lines |
D. Enclosure | II. A single ridge bifurcates and reunites to enclose some space |