The correct statement regarding Article 370 of the Constitution of India is: It gave special status to the erstwhile state of Jammu and Kashmir.
Article 370 was a special provision that provided autonomous status to the erstwhile state of Jammu and Kashmir. It allowed the state to have its own Constitution and limited the Indian Parliament's legislative powers concerning the state. Most of the laws passed by the Indian Parliament required the state government's concurrence to be applicable in Jammu and Kashmir.
On August 5, 2019, the Government of India abrogated Article 370, thereby revoking the special status of Jammu and Kashmir. The state was reorganized into two Union Territories: Jammu and Kashmir, and Ladakh, effective October 31, 2019.
As of the latest updates, India comprises 28 states and 8 Union territories. This configuration came about after the abrogation of Article 370 by the Indian Parliament and the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganization Act, 2019. Here's a brief overview of the relevant changes:
The former state of Jammu & Kashmir has been bifurcated into two Union territories: Jammu and Kashmir, and Ladakh as of 31 October 2019. This restructuring was pivotal in updating the administrative divisions of the country.
With these divisions effective, the total number of states remains 28. However, the addition of Jammu and Kashmir, and Ladakh as Union territories, has brought the number of Union territories up to 8.
Thus, the correct answer to the query regarding the number of states and Union territories in India is: 28 states and 8 Union territories.
\(S.no\) | \(Festival\) | \(S.no\) | \(State\) |
---|---|---|---|
I | Kadalekayi Parishe | A | Gujarat |
II | Bohag Bihu | B | Orissa |
III | Uttarayan | C | Assam |
IV | Nuakhai | D | Karnataka |
From a very early age, I knew that when I grew up, I should be a writer. I had the lonely child's habit of making up stories and holding conversations with imaginary persons, and I think from the very start my literary ambitions were mixed up with the feeling of being isolated and undervalued. I knew that I had a facility with words and a power of facing unpleasant facts, and I felt that this created a sort of private world in which I could get my own back for my failure in everyday life. I wanted to write enormous naturalistic novels with unhappy endings, full of detailed descriptions and arresting similes, and also full of purple passages in which words were used partly for the sake of their sound. I give all this background information because I do not think one can assess a writer's motives without knowing something of his early development.
His subject-matter will be determined by the age he lives in — at least this is true in tumultuous, revolutionary ages like our own — but before he ever begins to write he will have acquired an emotional attitude from which he will never completely escape. It is his job to discipline his temperament, but if he escapes from his early influences altogether, he will have killed his impulse to write. I think there are four great motives for writing, at any rate for writing prose. They are: (i) Sheer egoism: Desire to seem clever, to be talked about, to be remembered after death, to get your own back on grown-ups who snubbed you in childhood; (ii) Aesthetic enthusiasm: Desire to share an experience which one feels is valuable and ought not to be missed (iii) Historical impulse: Desire to see things as they are, to find out true facts and store them up for the use of posterity (iv) Political purpose: Desire to push the world in a certain direction, to alter other people's idea of the kind of society that they should strive after.
[Extracted with edits from George Orwell's "Why I Write"]