Question

Which incident is described in the passage?

• A. Baisakhi festival at Amritsar, April 1919
• B. Jallianwala Bagh Massacre, April 1919
• C. Congress Protests of April 1919
• D. Non-Cooperation movement, April 1919
• A. To bring the crowd under control
• B. To scatter the crowd
• C. To teach the crowd a lesson
• D. To enforce the martial law
• A. To praise General Dyer
• B. To expose the deeds of General Dye
• C. To get sympathy for the Indians who died
• D. All of the above
• A. The army
• B. The police
• C. The civil administration
• D. Some people who lived nearby
• A. Friendliness to the British rule
• B. Bitterness about the British rule
• C. A sense of helplessness
• D. None of the above
• A. Reginald Murree Harry Dyer
• B. Reginald Royce Harry Dyer
• C. Reginald Edward Harry Dyer
• D. Reginald Coleman Harry Dyer

Answer 1

The Correct Option is B

Step 1: Understanding the context of the event:
The passage describes a tragic event that occurred in Amritsar in 1919. General Dyer, after being handed civil power by the Deputy-Commissioner, ordered his troops to open fire on a peaceful gathering at the Jallianwala Bagh. The crowd was not involved in any violence, and there were no warnings given before the firing commenced.

Step 2: Analyzing the details of the event:
The passage outlines the key details of the massacre: - General Dyer arrived at Amritsar on the evening of the 10th and issued a proclamation prohibiting meetings. - Two days later, when he learned about the gathering at Jallianwala Bagh, he ordered his troops to fire on the crowd. - The result was an estimated 400 to 500 people killed and 1,500 wounded, with many left to die from their wounds without medical assistance.

Step 3: Relating the event to the correct historical incident:
The event described in the passage is the infamous Jallianwala Bagh Massacre, which took place in April 1919. This massacre remains one of the darkest chapters in the history of British colonial rule in India, where British troops opened fire on a large crowd of unarmed civilians.

Step 4: Conclusion:
The correct answer is option (B): Jallianwala Bagh Massacre, April 1919, as the passage specifically describes this tragic event.

Answer 2

Step 1: Understanding General Dyer's motive:
The passage describes General Dyer’s decision to fire on the crowd at Jallianwala Bagh, which was a peaceful gathering. There was no immediate threat or violence from the crowd, yet General Dyer ordered the troops to open fire. This raises the question of why he took such extreme action.

Step 2: Analyzing General Dyer's justification:
In the passage, it is mentioned that General Dyer’s action was an attempt to assert control and send a message to the public. This suggests that his intent was not to respond to an immediate threat, but rather to demonstrate power and to "teach the crowd a lesson." He wanted to make an example of the gathering to deter any future protests or demonstrations.

Step 3: Connecting the reasoning to the correct answer:
The statement "to teach the crowd a lesson" fits perfectly with the idea that General Dyer's actions were meant to send a message to the public about the consequences of disobeying British authority. This aligns with the historical view that the massacre was a form of punishment aimed at discouraging further unrest.

Step 4: Conclusion:
The correct answer is option (C): To teach the crowd a lesson, as General Dyer's actions were intended to assert control and deliver a harsh lesson to the public, rather than responding to any direct threat.

Answer 3

Step 1: Understanding the speaker's purpose:
The passage is an excerpt from a speech by Col. Wedgwood in the British Parliament on 22nd December 1919. In this speech, he describes the events of the Jallianwala Bagh Massacre, where General Dyer ordered the indiscriminate killing of unarmed civilians. The tone and focus of the speech are critical of General Dyer's actions and the consequences of those actions.

Step 2: Analyzing the speaker's intent:
The speaker, Col. Wedgwood, is clearly condemning General Dyer's actions. He is exposing the brutality of the massacre, highlighting the suffering of the civilians, and calling attention to the lack of accountability for the atrocities committed. The speech aims to bring to light the horrifying nature of the massacre and the inhumane treatment of innocent people.

Step 3: Connecting the purpose to the correct answer:
Given the critical tone and the intent to bring attention to General Dyer's actions, the speaker's primary goal was to expose the deeds of General Dyer and make the public aware of the extent of the violence and injustice that occurred at Jallianwala Bagh.

Step 4: Conclusion:
The correct answer is To expose the deeds of General Dyer, as the speaker's purpose in this passage is to reveal the truth about the massacre and hold General Dyer accountable for his actions.

Answer 4

Step 1: Understanding the context of the aftermath of the massacre:
The passage describes the aftermath of the Jallianwala Bagh massacre, where General Dyer's troops fired on the peaceful crowd. The result was a large number of casualties, with 400 to 500 killed and 1,500 wounded. The wounded and dying, left without assistance from the authorities or the military, were in dire need of help.

Step 2: Analyzing the response to the wounded:
According to the passage, after the massacre, the wounded and dying were left without any care from the military or the authorities. The passage highlights that the people who came to help were not officials or soldiers, but rather some people who lived nearby. These local individuals carried away some of the wounded and attempted to provide assistance, even though they were not equipped or trained to handle such a crisis.

Step 3: Connecting the details to the correct answer:
The passage clearly states that the care for the wounded was provided by "those who lived nearby," indicating that local people, not the authorities, took action to help those who were injured.

Step 4: Conclusion:
The correct answer is option (D): Some people who lived nearby, as these were the individuals who provided assistance to the wounded after the massacre, since the authorities and military did not intervene.

Answer 5

Step 1: Understanding the context of the passage:
The passage describes the horrific Jallianwala Bagh massacre of 1919, where innocent civilians were killed and wounded by British troops under General Dyer’s orders. The massacre left a deep emotional and historical impact, particularly on those who witnessed the violence and the generations that followed.

Step 2: Analyzing the speaker's reflection on the long-term impact:
The speaker in the passage anticipates that future generations, particularly children brought to the site of the massacre, will feel a strong emotional reaction to what happened. The brutality and injustice of the event would likely leave a lasting legacy of anger and resentment towards the British colonial rulers, as it was a clear example of oppression.

Step 3: Connecting this emotional response to the correct answer:
The passage suggests that the children brought to the site of the massacre would likely harbor negative emotions due to the legacy of violence left by British rule. The phrase “bitterness and resentment” clearly points towards feelings of bitterness about British rule, as these emotions would stem from the historical injustice and oppression experienced by their ancestors.

Step 4: Conclusion:
The correct answer is option (B): Bitterness about the British rule, as it reflects the emotional response that future generations would likely have towards the British colonial legacy, particularly in light of the massacre at Jallianwala Bagh.

Answer 6

Step 1: Understanding General Dyer's role in the Jallianwala Bagh massacre:
The passage discusses the infamous actions of General Dyer during the Jallianwala Bagh massacre in 1919, where he ordered his troops to fire on a peaceful crowd. This event became a symbol of British brutality in India, and General Dyer became a controversial figure in history due to his role in the massacre.

Step 2: Identifying General Dyer's full name:
The passage specifies that General Dyer’s full name was **Reginald Edward Harry Dyer**. He is infamous for his actions at Jallianwala Bagh, which has left a dark legacy in the history of British colonial rule in India.

Step 3: Analyzing the provided answer options:
The correct full name of General Dyer is **Reginald Edward Harry Dyer**, which matches option (C). This full name is historically accurate, and it is important in identifying him correctly in the context of the Jallianwala Bagh massacre.

Step 4: Conclusion:
The correct answer is option (C): Reginald Edward Harry Dyer, as this is his full name, and he is infamously remembered for his role in the tragic event at Jallianwala Bagh.