Step 1: Understanding the Concept:
The question asks to identify the type of microscopy for which the negative staining technique is primarily used.
Step 2: Detailed Explanation:
Negative staining is a sample preparation technique where a specimen is suspended in a solution of an electron-dense material, such as uranyl acetate or phosphotungstic acid. When dried, the heavy metal stain forms a dark background around the much lighter, unstained specimen. This creates a high-contrast image that reveals the size and surface morphology of very small objects like viruses, bacteria, or macromolecules. Because this technique relies on the differential scattering of electrons passing through the stained background versus the unstained sample, it is a method used for Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM).
\[\begin{array}{rl} \bullet & \text{SEM and ESEM visualize surface topography and do not use negative staining. } \\ \bullet & \text{Confocal Microscopy is a type of light microscopy that uses fluorescence and is not related to this staining method. } \\ \end{array}\]
Step 3: Final Answer:
The negative staining method is generally used in TEM (Transmission Electron Microscopy).
The change of source of illumination from light to electrons significantly improved the \(\underline{\hspace{2cm}}\) of the microscope.
Match the LIST-I (Spectroscopy) with LIST-II (Application)
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Visible light spectroscopy | III. Identification on the basis of color |
B. Fluorescence spectroscopy | IV. Identification on the basis of fluorophore present |
C. FTIR spectroscopy | I. Identification on the basis of absorption in infrared region |
D. Mass Spectroscopy | II. Identification on the basis of m/z ion |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Forensic Psychiatry | III. Behavioural pattern of criminal |
B. Forensic Engineering | IV. Origin of metallic fracture |
C. Forensic Odontology | I. Bite marks analysis |
D. Computer Forensics | II. Information derived from digital devices |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Calvin Goddard | II. Forensic Ballistics |
B. Karl Landsteiner | III. Blood Grouping |
C. Albert Osborn | IV. Document examination |
D. Mathieu Orfila | I. Forensic Toxicology |
Match the LIST-I (Evidence, etc.) with LIST-II (Example, Construction etc.)
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Biological evidence | IV. Blood |
B. Latent print evidence | III. Fingerprints |
C. Trace evidence | II. Soil |
D. Digital evidence | I. Cell phone records |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Ridges | III. The raised portion of the friction skin of the fingers |
B. Type Lines | I. Two most inner ridges which start parallel, diverge and surround or tend to surround the pattern area |
C. Delta | IV. The ridge characteristics nearest to the point of divergence of type lines |
D. Enclosure | II. A single ridge bifurcates and reunites to enclose some space |