Step 1: Understanding the Concept:
The question asks about the specific equipment needed to visualize microbial cells, such as bacteria, which are microscopic.
Step 2: Detailed Explanation:
Microbial cells are typically only a few micrometers (µm) in size. To see them clearly, a high level of magnification is required.
\[\begin{array}{rl} \bullet & \text{A standard compound light microscope is used. A "low-power" objective (e.g., 10x) is insufficient to resolve individual bacterial cells. A "high-power" objective is necessary. } \\ \bullet & \text{The highest power objective on a standard light microscope is the oil immersion lens, which has a magnification of 100x. When combined with the 10x magnification of the eyepiece (ocular lens), it provides a total magnification of \(100 \times 10 = 1,000\text{X}\). } \\ \bullet & \text{This 1,000X magnification is the standard and necessary level for routine examination of most bacteria. } \\ \end{array}\]
Option (3) is the most precise and correct answer. Option (1) is correct but less specific. Option (2) is incorrect. Option (4) is contradictory as 1,000X is high magnification, not low.
Step 3: Final Answer:
For the examination of microbial cells, we require the use of a high-power microscope at a magnification of about 1,000 X.
The change of source of illumination from light to electrons significantly improved the \(\underline{\hspace{2cm}}\) of the microscope.
Match the LIST-I (Spectroscopy) with LIST-II (Application)
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Visible light spectroscopy | III. Identification on the basis of color |
B. Fluorescence spectroscopy | IV. Identification on the basis of fluorophore present |
C. FTIR spectroscopy | I. Identification on the basis of absorption in infrared region |
D. Mass Spectroscopy | II. Identification on the basis of m/z ion |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Forensic Psychiatry | III. Behavioural pattern of criminal |
B. Forensic Engineering | IV. Origin of metallic fracture |
C. Forensic Odontology | I. Bite marks analysis |
D. Computer Forensics | II. Information derived from digital devices |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Calvin Goddard | II. Forensic Ballistics |
B. Karl Landsteiner | III. Blood Grouping |
C. Albert Osborn | IV. Document examination |
D. Mathieu Orfila | I. Forensic Toxicology |
Match the LIST-I (Evidence, etc.) with LIST-II (Example, Construction etc.)
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Biological evidence | IV. Blood |
B. Latent print evidence | III. Fingerprints |
C. Trace evidence | II. Soil |
D. Digital evidence | I. Cell phone records |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Ridges | III. The raised portion of the friction skin of the fingers |
B. Type Lines | I. Two most inner ridges which start parallel, diverge and surround or tend to surround the pattern area |
C. Delta | IV. The ridge characteristics nearest to the point of divergence of type lines |
D. Enclosure | II. A single ridge bifurcates and reunites to enclose some space |