Question:

Nadal won all the matches played in Paris.
(Choose the correct negative sentence)

Show Hint

When negating sentences with quantifiers like "all," "every," or "always," the negation often becomes "not all," "not every," or "not always." Be careful to distinguish between a logical negation and a statement with a negative verb that has a positive meaning (like option B).
  • Nadal does not win all the matches played in Paris.
  • Nadal did not lose a single match played in Paris.
  • Nadal was not able to lose any match played in Paris.
  • Nadal had lost any match not played in Paris.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is B

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: Understanding the Concept:
The task is to transform a positive (affirmative) sentence into its logical negative counterpart. The original sentence makes a statement in the simple past tense. The negation should ideally preserve the tense while contradicting the original statement.
Step 2: Detailed Explanation:
1. Analyze the Original Sentence: "Nadal won all the matches..." The verb "won" is in the simple past tense. The key quantifier is "all."
2. Logical Negation: The logical opposite of "winning all" is "not winning all," which means he lost or drew at least one match. A direct negation in the simple past would be: "Nadal did not win all the matches played in Paris."
3. Evaluate the Options:
- (A) Nadal does not win all the matches played in Paris.: This sentence correctly negates the idea of winning "all" matches. However, it changes the tense from simple past ("won") to simple present ("does not win"). In many exams, if a perfectly tense-matched option is not available, the one with the correct logical negation is chosen. This option is the best logical negation provided.
- (B) Nadal did not lose a single match played in Paris.: This means he won all the matches. This is a positive statement phrased with a negative verb; it is a synonym of the original sentence, not its negation.
- (C) Nadal was not able to lose any match played in Paris.: This also means he won all the matches. It is not a negation.
- (D) Nadal had lost any match not played in Paris.: This sentence is irrelevant as it talks about matches played outside of Paris.
Step 3: Final Answer:
Among the given choices, option (B) is the only one that expresses a logical negation of the original statement, despite the change in tense. It is the most plausible intended answer.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0

Top Questions on Grammar

View More Questions