| Group I | Group II |
| (P) NIMBY | (1) Affording a clear view of the waterfront to a plot through the abutting street |
| (Q) Form based code | (2) Planning and zoning tool to regulate development primarily through urban form |
| (R) Tactical urbanism | (3) Establishment of residential areas on the outskirts of a city |
| (S) Suburbanisation | (4) Short-term, low cost, scalable interventions and policies to change a neighbourhood |
| (5) Resisting any physical intervention by public or private enterprises within their neighbourhood |
| Group I | Group II |
| (P) Valley Section | (1) McGee and Gemburg |
| (Q) Third Place Theory | (2) Oscar Newman |
| (R) Defensible Space | (3) Ray Oldenberg |
| (S) Desakota Model | (4) Patrick Geddes |
| (5) C. A. Doxiadis |
Match the proponents in Group I with the corresponding theories in Group II.
\[\begin{array}{|c|l|c|l|} \hline \textbf{Group I} & & \textbf{Group II} & \\ \hline \text{(P)} & \text{James Q Wilson and George Kelling} & \text{(1)} & \text{Creative Class} \\ \hline \hline \text{(Q)} & \text{Sherry Arnstein} & \text{(2)} & \text{Right to City} \\ \hline \hline \text{(R)} & \text{Henry Lefebvre} & \text{(3)} & \text{Drive-in Culture} \\ \hline \hline \text{(S)} & \text{Richard Florida} & \text{(4)} & \text{Ladder of Citizen Participation} \\ \hline \hline & & \text{(5)} & \text{Broken Window} \\ \hline \end{array}\]
Match the examples in Group I with their corresponding typologies in Group II.

Fish : Shoal :: Lion : _________
Select the correct option to complete the analogy.
The given figure is reflected about the horizontal dashed line and then rotated clockwise by 90° about an axis perpendicular to the plane of the figure.
Which one of the following options correctly shows the resultant figure?
Note: The figures shown are representative
