Question:

Match the authors from Column I with their approaches in Column II. 


 

Show Hint

When studying Indian sociology, it’s important to understand the historical and cultural influences that shape the approaches of these scholars. M. M. Srinivas emphasized fieldwork, Dumont focused on Brahminical traditions, Desai critiqued capitalism, and Ghurye merged Indology and sociology.
Updated On: Apr 22, 2025
  • M-2; N-3; O-1; P-4
  • M-3; N-1; O-4; P-2
  • M-1; N-2; O-4; P-3
  • M-3; N-1; O-2; P-4
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is B

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: Understanding the Approaches.

Let’s break down the correct matching of the authors with their approaches:

M. N. Srinivas: He emphasized the importance of the field view, advocating that sociology should be based on empirical, fieldwork observations rather than theoretical study. This corresponds to Approach 3: "Indian sociology must emphasize the field view and not the book view."

Louis Dumont: Known for his analysis of Brahminical Hinduism and its role in shaping Indian society, Dumont argued that Indian society is deeply influenced by Brahminical traditions, which have held society together. This aligns with Approach 1: "Indian society is produced by the spread of Brahminical Hinduism."

A. R. Desai: He was a Marxist scholar and believed that a critical study of capitalism in India required historical analysis. His approach matches Approach 4: "A critical sociology of India has to undertake the study of the capitalist system as its main focus."

G. S. Ghurye: Known for advocating that Indian sociology must be understood at the intersection of Indology and sociology, Ghurye emphasized the role of cultural and traditional aspects in shaping Indian society. This corresponds to Approach 2: "Indian sociology must be located at the intersection of Indology and sociology."
Was this answer helpful?
0
0