Question

Match List-I with List-II\[\begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline \textbf{List-1} & \textbf{List-II} \\ \hline \text{(A) Hadley v. Baxendale} & \text{(1) Undue Influence} \\ \hline \text{(B) Henkel v. Pape} & \text{(II) Coercion} \\ \hline \text{(C) Manu Singh v. Umadat Pandey} & \text{(III) Quantum of Damages} \\ \hline \text{(D) Chikkam Amiraju v. Seshamma} & \text{(IV) Mistake} \\ \hline \end{array}\]

• A. (A)-(I), (B)-(II), (C)-(III), (D)-(IV)
• B. (A)-(I), (B)-(III), (C)-(II), (D)-(IV)
• C. (A)-(III), (B)-(II), (C)-(IV), (D)-(I)
• D. (A)-(III), (B)-(IV), (C)-(I), (D)-(II)

Hint:

Understanding case laws helps clarify legal concepts such as coercion, undue influence, and damages.

Answer 1

The Correct Option is C

Step 1: Review case laws and their relevance.
- Hadley v. Baxendale relates to the quantum of damages in contract law.
- Henkel v. Pape relates to coercion.
- Manu Singh v. Umadat Pandey deals with the doctrine of mistake.
- Chikkam Amiraju v. Seshamma deals with undue influence.