Question:

Many environmentalists are inconsistent: progress without some interference with nature is a myth, yet environment includes animal wealth too, so we must ask whether we may kill living beings (even harmful insects/stray dogs) merely for hygiene. Which one of the following runs {counter to the spirit of the passage?}

Show Hint

When asked for the choice “counter to the spirit,” find the option that affirms what the author {questions} or cautions against.
Updated On: Aug 12, 2025
  • In the interest of health and cleanliness, our surroundings must be free from disease–spreading bacteria.
  • Non-violence as a moral principle extends to all living creatures.
  • Vegetarian food is ideal to all men.
  • Man should protect his environment because he has to live.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is A

Solution and Explanation

Step 1 (Extract the author’s stance). The author insists on a balanced view: acknowledge technological progress yet treat animals as part of the environment and {question} killing “for hygiene.”
Step 2 (Test options against the stance). - (b) supports universal non-violence—consistent with the author’s challenge to killing for hygiene.
- (d) urges environmental protection—again harmonious.
- (c) is tangential (dietary preference), not contrary.
- (a) explicitly demands eliminating disease organisms “for cleanliness,” i.e., endorses killing {because of hygiene}—the very position the author asks us to scrutinize.
Hence (a) {runs counter} to the passage.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0

Top Questions on Verbal Reasoning

View More Questions

Questions Asked in CLAT exam

View More Questions