To solve the problem, we are given a relation \( R \) on \( \mathbb{R} \):
\[ R = \{(x, y) \in \mathbb{R} \times \mathbb{R} \mid x - y + \sqrt{3} \in \mathbb{R} \setminus \mathbb{Q} \} \] i.e., the pair \( (x, y) \in R \) if and only if \( x - y + \sqrt{3} \) is irrational.
We will check whether \( R \) is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive.
1. Reflexivity:
A relation \( R \) is reflexive if \( (x, x) \in R \) for all \( x \in \mathbb{R} \).
Check: \[ x - x + \sqrt{3} = \sqrt{3} \] Since \( \sqrt{3} \) is irrational, \( (x, x) \in R \) for all \( x \).
Hence, \( R \) is reflexive.
2. Symmetry:
A relation \( R \) is symmetric if \( (x, y) \in R \Rightarrow (y, x) \in R \).
Suppose \( (x, y) \in R \Rightarrow x - y + \sqrt{3} \) is irrational.
Check \( (y, x) \in R \Rightarrow y - x + \sqrt{3} = -(x - y) + \sqrt{3} \).
Now, the sum of an irrational number and its negative may or may not be irrational:
Example: Let \( x = \sqrt{3}, y = 0 \Rightarrow x - y + \sqrt{3} = 2\sqrt{3} \) (irrational)
Then \( y - x + \sqrt{3} = -\sqrt{3} + \sqrt{3} = 0 \) (rational)
So \( (x, y) \in R \), but \( (y, x) \notin R \).
Hence, \( R \) is not symmetric.
3. Transitivity:
A relation \( R \) is transitive if \( (x, y) \in R \) and \( (y, z) \in R \Rightarrow (x, z) \in R \).
Suppose: \[ x - y + \sqrt{3} \in \mathbb{I}, \quad y - z + \sqrt{3} \in \mathbb{I} \] Add both: \[ (x - y + \sqrt{3}) + (y - z + \sqrt{3}) = x - z + 2\sqrt{3} \] Now \( 2\sqrt{3} \) is irrational, but \( x - z + 2\sqrt{3} \) may or may not be irrational, depending on \( x - z \).
Example: Let \( x = \sqrt{3}, y = 0, z = -\sqrt{3} \)
Then: - \( x - y + \sqrt{3} = \sqrt{3} + \sqrt{3} = 2\sqrt{3} \) → irrational - \( y - z + \sqrt{3} = 0 + \sqrt{3} + \sqrt{3} = 2\sqrt{3} \) → irrational - But \( x - z + \sqrt{3} = \sqrt{3} - (-\sqrt{3}) + \sqrt{3} = 3\sqrt{3} \) → still irrational Try counterexample: Let \( x = 1 - \sqrt{3}, y = 1, z = 1 + \sqrt{3} \)
- \( x - y + \sqrt{3} = (1 - \sqrt{3}) - 1 + \sqrt{3} = 0 \) → rational
So, we can't guarantee transitivity.
More accurately, find a direct counterexample where both pairs are in \( R \), but the third is not.
That might be hard to construct exactly, but the structure does not preserve irrationality additively in general.
Thus, no general guarantee of transitivity.
Hence, \( R \) is not transitive.
Final Answer:
- Reflexive: Yes
- Symmetric: No
- Transitive: No
A carpenter needs to make a wooden cuboidal box, closed from all sides, which has a square base and fixed volume. Since he is short of the paint required to paint the box on completion, he wants the surface area to be minimum.
On the basis of the above information, answer the following questions :
Find a relation between \( x \) and \( y \) such that the surface area \( S \) is minimum.
A school is organizing a debate competition with participants as speakers and judges. $ S = \{S_1, S_2, S_3, S_4\} $ where $ S = \{S_1, S_2, S_3, S_4\} $ represents the set of speakers. The judges are represented by the set: $ J = \{J_1, J_2, J_3\} $ where $ J = \{J_1, J_2, J_3\} $ represents the set of judges. Each speaker can be assigned only one judge. Let $ R $ be a relation from set $ S $ to $ J $ defined as: $ R = \{(x, y) : \text{speaker } x \text{ is judged by judge } y, x \in S, y \in J\} $.
During the festival season, a mela was organized by the Resident Welfare Association at a park near the society. The main attraction of the mela was a huge swing, which traced the path of a parabola given by the equation:\[ x^2 = y \quad \text{or} \quad f(x) = x^2 \]