Step 1: Interpret the given property.
Given \( H \cap gHg^{-1} = \{e\} \) for all \( g \notin H \), it means conjugates of \( H \) outside \( H \) intersect trivially with \( H \).
This suggests \( H \) is abelian and self-centralizing.
Step 2: Define \( K \).
\( K = \{ g \in G : gh = hg \text{ for all } h \in H \} \) is the centralizer of \( H \) in \( G \).
Since \( H \) is abelian, all its elements commute with each other, so \( H \subseteq K. \)
Step 3: Show equality.
If \( g \in K \setminus H \), then \( gHg^{-1} = H \) (since they commute elementwise), contradicting \( H \cap gHg^{-1} = \{ e \}. \)
Thus, no such \( g \) exists, implying \( K = H. \)
Final Answer: \[ \boxed{K = H.} \]