Scientific management, introduced by Frederick Taylor, focuses on maximizing efficiency and productivity through task specialization and systematic measurement. While the system has led to significant improvements in efficiency and output in industrial settings, it has been criticized for being dehumanizing. The method treats workers as mere cogs in a machine, focused solely on output rather than on their well-being or personal development. 
Key points of criticism:  
- {Lack of worker autonomy:} Workers are assigned specific, repetitive tasks and have little control over their work processes.
- {Focus on output over workers' welfare:} The primary concern is maximizing productivity, often at the cost of employee satisfaction.
- {Monotony and fatigue:} Repetitive tasks can lead to a lack of engagement and physical strain on workers.
Conclusion:  
While scientific management may improve efficiency, it often overlooks the social and psychological needs of workers, making it inhumane from a worker-centric perspective.
  
 
Final Answer:  
\[
\boxed{\text{Yes, scientific management is considered inhumane by some due to its dehumanizing approach.}}
\]