Comprehension
’India is the only country in the world where, in the States which are governed by the Communist party, human rights are fully respected-and that is only because the Bill of Rights is firmly entrenched in our national Constitution. We can proudly say that our Constitution gave us a flying start and equipped us adequately to meet the challenges of the future.’
Question: 1

Which of the following conclusions is not implied by the passage above?

Show Hint

Extreme words like “never” or “always” usually indicate that an option may not be implied unless explicitly stated.
Updated On: Aug 11, 2025
  • Communist states often do not respect human rights.
  • Communist states never respect human rights.
  • The entrenchment of the Bill of Rights is what ensures that even Communist-governed states respect human rights.
  • The Indian Constitution prepared India for the challenges of independence.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is B

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: Understand the passage argument
The author says that: - India is unique in having Communist-governed states where human rights are respected. - This is due to the Constitution and its Bill of Rights. - Implication: Normally, Communist states do not always respect human rights. Step 2: Analyze each option - (a) Often do not respect human rights} — implied, aligns with contrast made. \checkmark - (b) Never respect human rights} — extreme, not implied. The passage shows exceptions (Indian states). ✗ - (c) Bill of Rights makes Communist states comply} — matches passage idea. \checkmark - (d) Constitution prepared India for challenges} — implied in “equipped us adequately.” \checkmark Hence, (b) is the only statement not implied — it overstates. % Final Answer \[ \boxed{\text{(b)}} \]
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 2

Which of the following, if true, would weaken the above argument?

Show Hint

To weaken an argument, look for statements that offer an alternative explanation or invalidate the author’s cause-effect assumption.
Updated On: Aug 11, 2025
  • Communist governments are motivated to respect human rights out of Communist principles, not Constitutional ones.
  • The Constitution of India is itself sympathetic to Communist principles.
  • Human rights need to be enforceable to have any meaning.
  • Countries without a strong culture of human rights are prone to oppressing minorities.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is A

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: Understand the argument
The passage argues that in India, **respect for human rights in Communist-governed states** exists **only because** of the Constitution's Bill of Rights. So the assumption is: Without the Constitution, Communist principles wouldn't ensure these rights.} Step 2: Analyze the options to find which one weakens this - (a) Human rights are respected due to Communist ideology itself} — This directly weakens the central argument. - (b) Constitution is sympathetic to Communism} — may align with the passage, but doesn’t refute it. ✗ - (c) Enforceability of human rights} — a general statement, not related to Constitution vs. ideology contrast. ✗ - (d) Cultural weakness and oppression} — unrelated to the Indian constitutional setup. ✗ Thus, (a) contradicts the idea that only the Constitution causes rights to be respected. % Final Answer \[ \boxed{\text{(a)}} \]
Was this answer helpful?
0
0

Top Questions on Reading Comprehension

View More Questions

Questions Asked in CLAT exam

View More Questions